Takagi H, Hirose H, Sasaki E, Mikamo H, Imaizumi M, Hirota T, Bando M, Furuzawa Y, Murakawa S, Mori Y
First Department of Surgery, Gifu University School of Medicine, Tsukasa, Japan.
Artif Organs. 1997 Aug;21(8):929-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb00253.x.
For the application of the latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) to circulatory assist, the muscle is stimulated with co- or counterpulsation during the cardiac cycle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the blood supply to the LDM and its muscular performance during each respective stimulation. The origin of the LDM was connected to a tension gauge, a potentiometer, and 1 kg of weight in series. The LDM was stimulated at a ratio of 1:1 of heart to muscle contraction for 10 min. Copulsatile stimulation made thoracodorsal arterial flow (TDF) predominant during cardiac diastole. In counterpulsatile stimulation, TDF occurred predominantly during cardiac systole. Between the 2 patterns of stimulation, no significant differences were observed in the mean TDF rate during 1 cardiac cycle. The maximal force, maximal contraction length, and power of the LDM also did not differ significantly. These results suggest that despite the difference of the TDF profile, LDM performance may be comparable between co- and counterpulsatile stimulation for the application of the LDM to circulatory assist.
为了将背阔肌(LDM)应用于循环辅助,在心动周期中对该肌肉进行同向或反向搏动刺激。本研究的目的是评估在每种刺激过程中背阔肌的血液供应及其肌肉性能。背阔肌的起点串联连接到一个张力计、一个电位计和1千克重物。以心脏与肌肉收缩1:1的比例刺激背阔肌10分钟。同向搏动刺激使胸背动脉血流(TDF)在心脏舒张期占主导。在反向搏动刺激中,TDF主要发生在心脏收缩期。在这两种刺激模式之间,在1个心动周期内的平均TDF速率未观察到显著差异。背阔肌的最大力量、最大收缩长度和功率也没有显著差异。这些结果表明,尽管TDF曲线存在差异,但在将背阔肌应用于循环辅助时,同向和反向搏动刺激下背阔肌的性能可能相当。