Statistics in the journal--significance, confidence, and all that.
作者信息
Northridge M E, Levin B, Feinleib M, Susser M W
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1092-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1092.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Statistics in the journal--significance, confidence, and all that.期刊中的统计学——显著性、置信度以及诸如此类的内容。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1092-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1092.
2
[Statistics on the contributions of female authors to the journal Psyche].[《心灵》杂志女性作者贡献统计]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1986 Dec;40(12):1135-8.
3
The trend toward increased use of statistics in published orthodontic articles.
Angle Orthod. 1986 Oct;56(4):294-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0294:TTTIUO>2.0.CO;2.
4
An aid to generating figures for the American Journal of Epidemiology using SAS/GRAPH.
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 1;182(9):747-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv216. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
5
Reporting statistical information in medical journal articles.医学期刊文章中的统计信息报告。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Apr;157(4):321-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.4.321.
6
A 5-year review of statistical methods presented in The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.《足踝外科杂志》发表的统计方法的5年回顾
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Sep-Oct;49(5):471-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.05.005.
7
Concerning the probability of our confidence in statistics.关于我们对统计学信心的概率。
Alcohol Alcohol. 1987;22(2):99-101.
8
A "simple" method for spurious biostatistics: response to the manuscript submitted to the FASEB Journal by Hudes, et al.一种用于虚假生物统计学的“简单”方法：对Hudes等人提交给《FASEB杂志》的稿件的回应
FASEB J. 2009 Mar;23(3):704-5; discussion 706-8. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-118265. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
9
Recommendations to improve adverse event reporting in clinical trial publications: a joint pharmaceutical industry/journal editor perspective.改善临床试验出版物中不良事件报告的建议：制药行业/期刊编辑联合视角
BMJ. 2016 Oct 3;355:i5078. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5078.
10
Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal.小型医学期刊统计编辑的任命与统计质量
Croat Med J. 2001 Oct;42(5):500-3.
引用本文的文献
1
"Magnitude-based inference": a statistical review.“基于量级的推断”：一项统计学综述。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Apr;47(4):874-84. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000451.
2
It's about time: team-based editing at the American Journal of Public Health.是时候了：《美国公共卫生杂志》的团队编辑模式。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2009-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300310. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
3
African American Adolescent Females: Mother-Involved HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention.非裔美国青少年女性：母亲参与的降低艾滋病毒风险干预措施。
J HIV AIDS Soc Serv. 2009 Jul 1;8(3):292-307. doi: 10.1080/15381500903130488.
本文引用的文献
1
Annotation: what can be done about missing data? Approaches to imputation.注释：对于缺失数据该怎么做？插补方法。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Apr;87(4):548-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.4.548.
2
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.提高随机对照试验报告的质量。CONSORT声明。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637.
3
Prior, duplicate, repetitive, fragmented, and redundant publication and editorial decisions.先前的、重复的、冗余的、碎片化的以及多余的发表和编辑决策。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):792-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.792.
4
The statistical basis of meta-analysis.荟萃分析的统计学基础。
Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2(2):121-45. doi: 10.1177/096228029300200202.
5
Annotation: accounting for the effects of both group- and individual-level variables in community-level studies.注释：在社区层面研究中考虑群体和个体层面变量的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):163-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.163.
6
Public health methods--attributable risk as a link between causality and public health action.公共卫生方法——归因风险作为因果关系与公共卫生行动之间的纽带。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1202-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1202.
7
Confidence intervals vs significance tests: quantitative interpretation.置信区间与显著性检验：定量解释
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):587-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.587.
8
Significance tests have a role in epidemiologic research: reactions to A. M. Walker.显著性检验在流行病学研究中的作用：对A.M.沃克的回应
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):559-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.559.
9
Reporting the results of epidemiologic studies.报告流行病学研究结果。
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):556-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.556.
10
Significance tests represent consensus and standard practice.显著性检验代表了共识和标准做法。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Aug;76(8):1033-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.8.1033.
Zotero 插件