• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用两种效力测试方法对一种动物狂犬病疫苗进行评估。

Evaluation of an animal rabies vaccine by use of two types of potency tests.

作者信息

Baer G M

机构信息

Laboratorios Baer, SA de CV, Mexico DF, Mexico.

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 1997 Aug;58(8):837-40.

PMID:9256966
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potency of an inactivated animal rabies vaccine for domestic animals by use of 2 types of potency tests after challenge exposure with a laboratory standard virus or 1 of 5 viruses obtained from various wildlife species.

ANIMALS

384 mice vaccinated twice intraperitoneally; 384 mice vaccinated once IM.

PROCEDURE

Mice vaccinated with an inactivated, adjuvanted rabies vaccine for domestic animals were challenge exposed with the common fixed challenge virus or 1 of 5 rabies viruses obtained from wild animal species (street viruses) that most commonly transmit the virus in the United States and Canada. Potency tests included 2 types of antigen extinction tests: the National Institutes of Health (NIH) test and the Centers for Disease Control test.

RESULTS

Results of both tests indicated that protection was highest against raccoon and bat viruses. Marked differences were detected in the relative potency ratios for the NIH versus the Centers for Disease Control tests, though the relative potencies themselves (against the street viruses) did not differ markedly.

CONCLUSIONS

The markedly reduced potency against the street viruses indicated by the NIH test results was suggestive of an inherent bias associated with double intraperitoneal vaccination and intracerebral challenge exposure, whereas the single IM vaccination and IM challenge exposure reduced that bias.

摘要

目的

通过在接种实验室标准病毒或从5种野生动物病毒中获取的1种病毒(从各种野生动物物种中获得)后使用2种效力测试方法,评估一种用于家畜的灭活动物狂犬病疫苗的效力。

动物

384只小鼠经腹腔注射接种两次;384只小鼠经肌肉注射接种一次。

程序

用一种用于家畜的灭活佐剂狂犬病疫苗接种的小鼠,经普通固定攻击病毒或从美国和加拿大最常传播该病毒的野生动物物种中获得的5种狂犬病病毒(街毒)之一进行攻击暴露。效力测试包括2种抗原灭活测试:美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)测试和疾病控制中心测试。

结果

两种测试结果均表明,对浣熊和蝙蝠病毒的保护作用最高。尽管NIH测试和疾病控制中心测试的相对效力本身(针对街毒)没有显著差异,但在相对效力比方面检测到显著差异。

结论

NIH测试结果表明对街毒的效力显著降低,这表明与腹腔内两次接种和脑内攻击暴露相关的固有偏差,而单次肌肉注射接种和肌肉注射攻击暴露减少了该偏差。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an animal rabies vaccine by use of two types of potency tests.使用两种效力测试方法对一种动物狂犬病疫苗进行评估。
Am J Vet Res. 1997 Aug;58(8):837-40.
2
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2004.2004年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Dec 15;227(12):1912-25. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1912.
3
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2006.2006年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Aug 15;231(4):540-56. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.4.540.
4
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2007.2007年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Sep 15;233(6):884-97. doi: 10.2460/javma.233.6.884.
5
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2005.2005年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Dec 15;229(12):1897-911. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.12.1897.
6
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1996.1996年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Dec 15;211(12):1525-39.
7
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1994.1994年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Dec 15;207(12):1562-75.
8
[Antigenic determination of human anti-rabies vaccine against viral street strains common in the wild animal population in Poland].[针对波兰野生动物群体中常见的狂犬病病毒街毒株的人用狂犬病疫苗抗原性测定]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1994;46(4):331-47.
9
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2009.2009年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Sep 15;237(6):646-57. doi: 10.2460/javma.237.6.646.
10
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1993.1993年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994 Dec 15;205(12):1695-709.