Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D
Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Critical Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany.
Resuscitation. 1997 Aug;35(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1.
American Heart Association as well as European Resuscitation Council require the carotid pulse check to determine pulselessness in an unconscious victim and to decide whether or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be initiated. Recent studies on the ability of health professionals to check the carotid pulse have called this diagnostic tool in question and led to discussions. To contribute to this discussion we performed a study to evaluate skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. A group of 449 volunteers (most had participated in a first aid course) were asked to check the carotid pulse in a young healthy, non-obese person by counting aloud the detected pulse rate. Time intervals until correct detection of the carotid pulse were registered. Overall the volunteers needed an average of 9.46 s, ranging from 1 to 70 s. Only 47.4% of the volunteers were able to detect a pulse within 5 s, and 73.7% within 10 s. A level of 95% volunteers detecting the pulse correctly was reached only after 35 s. Based on these findings we conclude that the intervals established for carotid pulse check may be too short and that perhaps the value of pulse check within in the scope of CPR needs to be reconsidered.
美国心脏协会以及欧洲复苏委员会要求检查颈动脉搏动,以确定无意识患者是否无脉搏,并决定是否应开始心肺复苏(CPR)。最近关于医疗专业人员检查颈动脉搏动能力的研究对这一诊断工具提出了质疑,并引发了讨论。为了对这一讨论做出贡献,我们进行了一项研究,以评估非专业人员检查颈动脉搏动的技能。一组449名志愿者(大多数参加过急救课程)被要求通过大声数出检测到的脉搏率,来检查一名年轻、健康、非肥胖者的颈动脉搏动。记录直到正确检测到颈动脉搏动的时间间隔。总体而言,志愿者平均需要9.46秒,范围从1秒到70秒。只有47.4%的志愿者能够在5秒内检测到脉搏,73.7%的志愿者能在10秒内检测到。只有在35秒后,95%的志愿者才能正确检测到脉搏。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,为检查颈动脉搏动设定的时间间隔可能太短,也许需要重新考虑在心肺复苏范围内检查脉搏的价值。