Faldaas Bjørn Ove, Nielsen Erik Waage, Storm Benjamin Stage, Lappegård Knut Tore, How Ole-Jakob, Nilsen Bent Aksel, Kiss Gabriel, Skogvoll Eirik, Torp Hans, Ingul Charlotte
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 20;15:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100412. eCollection 2023 Sep.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pulse palpation is an unreliable method for diagnosing cardiac arrest. To address this limitation, continuous hemodynamic monitoring may be a viable solution. Therefore, we developed a novel, hands-free Doppler system, RescueDoppler, to detect the pulse continuously in the carotid artery.
In twelve pigs, we evaluated RescueDoppleŕs potential to measure blood flow velocity in three situations where pulse palpation of the carotid artery was insufficient: (1) systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg, (2) ventricular fibrillation (VF) and (3) pulseless electrical activity (PEA). (1) Low blood pressure was induced using a Fogarty balloon catheter to occlude the inferior vena cava. (2) An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator induced VF. (3) Myocardial infarction after microembolization of the left coronary artery caused True-PEA. Invasive blood pressure was measured in the contralateral carotid artery. Time-averaged blood flow velocity (TAV) in the carotid artery was related to mean arterial pressure (MAP) in a linear mixed model.
RescueDoppler identified pulsatile blood flow in 41/41 events with systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg, with lowest blood pressure of 19 mmHg. In addition the absence of spontaneous circulation was identified in 21/21 VF events and true PEA in 2/2 events. The intraclass correlation coefficient within animals for TAV and MAP was 0.94 (95% CI. 0.85-0.98).
In a porcine model, RescueDoppler reliably identified pulsative blood flow with blood pressures below 60 mmHg. During VF and PEA, circulatory arrest was rapidly and accurately demonstrated. RescueDoppler could potentially replace unreliable pulse palpation during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
背景/目的:脉搏触诊是诊断心脏骤停的不可靠方法。为解决这一局限性,连续血流动力学监测可能是一种可行的解决方案。因此,我们开发了一种新型的免提多普勒系统——RescueDoppler,用于连续检测颈动脉搏动。
在12头猪身上,我们评估了RescueDoppler在三种颈动脉脉搏触诊不足的情况下测量血流速度的潜力:(1)收缩压低于60mmHg,(2)室颤(VF),(3)无脉电活动(PEA)。(1)使用Fogarty球囊导管阻塞下腔静脉诱导低血压。(2)植入式心脏复律除颤器诱发室颤。(3)左冠状动脉微栓塞后心肌梗死导致真性PEA。在对侧颈动脉测量有创血压。在一个线性混合模型中,颈动脉的时间平均血流速度(TAV)与平均动脉压(MAP)相关。
RescueDoppler在收缩压低于60mmHg的41/41例事件中识别出搏动性血流,最低血压为19mmHg。此外,在21/21例室颤事件中识别出无自主循环,在2/2例事件中识别出真性PEA。动物体内TAV和MAP的组内相关系数为0.94(95%CI.0.85 - 0.98)。
在猪模型中,RescueDoppler能可靠地识别血压低于60mmHg时的搏动性血流。在室颤和PEA期间,能快速准确地显示循环骤停。RescueDoppler有可能在心脏骤停和心肺复苏期间取代不可靠的脉搏触诊。