Setiabuhdi M, Theis M, Norback J
Food Science Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Aug;97(8):889-91. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00217-4.
Reliable, verifiable food safety requires the application of technologically correct methods in a systematic way. This requires making a distinction between sanitation and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) and integrating these two systems into one food safety system. Although sanitation and HACCP share the same goal of producing safe food products, the focus of sanitation is on the environment surrounding the food to prevent contamination, whereas the focus of HACCP is on controlling hazards intrinsic to food materials. Together they provide the organizational base for applying the correct methods and procedures to ensure and verify that food served is safe for foodservice clients. These approaches also provide records that demonstrate that food safety measures have been planned and completed as planned. One way to demonstrate a responsible approach to food safety is to understand the differences between sanitation and HACCP and to build approaches to food safety that use both of these systems. The resulting integrated system has a better chance of controlling all the hazards than either system by itself.
可靠、可验证的食品安全要求以系统的方式应用技术上正确的方法。这需要区分卫生与危害分析和关键控制点(HACCP),并将这两个系统整合到一个食品安全体系中。虽然卫生和HACCP都有生产安全食品的共同目标,但卫生的重点是食品周围的环境以防止污染,而HACCP的重点是控制食品原料固有的危害。它们共同为应用正确的方法和程序提供了组织基础,以确保并核实供餐饮服务客户食用的食品是安全的。这些方法还提供记录,证明食品安全措施已按计划制定并完成。展示对食品安全负责态度的一种方法是了解卫生与HACCP之间的差异,并构建同时使用这两个系统的食品安全方法。由此产生的综合系统比任何一个单独的系统更有可能控制所有危害。