Reigner B G, Williams P E, Patel I H, Steimer J L, Peck C, van Brummelen P
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Aug;33(2):142-52. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733020-00005.
The integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles into drug development has been proposed as a way of making it more rational and efficient. The use of these principles in drug development to make scientific and strategic decisions is defined as the 'pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach to drug development'. The objectives of this survey were: (i) to assess the extent the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach to drug development has been used in a large multinational pharmaceutical company: (ii) to evaluate the impact of pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic results on clinical drug development; and (iii) to identify factors which prevented the full application of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach. This was done by looking at 18 projects in the current development portfolio at Hoffman La Roche and evaluating the use of this approach by interviewing the responsible clinical pharmacologist using a standardised questionnaire. (i) Benefits from using the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach were reported in every project, independent of development phase and therapeutic area. This approach was more extensively used in the recent projects. The selection of dosages in clinical studies was found to be the most important application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic results in terms of an impact on drug development. (ii) Time savings, up to several months, could be quantified in 8 projects during the entry-into-man studies and in 6 projects during the phase II or III studies. In 4 projects, 1 clinical study was avoided. (iii) The most important scientific factor preventing the full application of the approach was the lack of knowledge on the predictive value of the pharmacodynamic or surrogate marker for effect (6 projects). The results of the survey have shown that the use of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach has contributed to making clinical drug development more rational and more efficient. Opportunities to apply the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach should be identified in each project and a project specific strategy for the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided approach should be defined during phase 0 of drug development.
有人提出将药代动力学和药效学原理整合到药物研发中,以使研发过程更合理、高效。在药物研发中运用这些原理做出科学和战略决策,被定义为“药代动力学 - 药效学指导的药物研发方法”。本次调查的目的是:(i)评估药代动力学 - 药效学指导的药物研发方法在一家大型跨国制药公司中的应用程度;(ii)评估药代动力学和/或药效学结果对临床药物研发的影响;(iii)确定阻碍药代动力学 - 药效学指导方法全面应用的因素。通过研究霍夫曼 - 罗氏公司当前研发组合中的18个项目,并使用标准化问卷对负责的临床药理学家进行访谈,来评估该方法的使用情况。(i)每个项目都报告了使用药代动力学 - 药效学指导方法的益处,与研发阶段和治疗领域无关。这种方法在近期项目中使用得更为广泛。就对药物研发的影响而言,临床研究中剂量的选择被认为是药代动力学 - 药效学结果最重要的应用。(ii)在8个项目的首次人体试验阶段以及6个项目的II期或III期研究中,可以量化节省多达数月的时间。在4个项目中,避免了1项临床研究。(iii)阻碍该方法全面应用的最重要科学因素是缺乏对药效学或替代标志物对疗效预测价值的了解(6个项目)。调查结果表明,药代动力学 - 药效学指导方法的使用有助于使临床药物研发更加合理和高效。应在每个项目中确定应用药代动力学 - 药效学方法的机会,并在药物研发的0期确定针对药代动力学 - 药效学指导方法的项目特定策略。