Hlastala S A, Frank E, Mallinger A G, Thase M E, Ritenour A M, Kupfer D J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, PA 15213, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 1997;5(2):73-83.
We sought to determine whether depressive and mixed/cycling episodes were as responsive to standardized pharmacotherapeutic interventions as were manic episodes in bipolar 1 patients. As part of the Maintenance Therapies in Bipolar Disorder (MH29618, E. Frank, PI) study, forty-two acutely ill bipolar 1 patients who had been randomly assigned to one of two preliminary phase non-pharmacologic treatment strategies (interpersonal and social rhythm therapy [IPSRT] or a standard medication clinic approach) were treated according to a standardized pharmacotherapeutic protocol. Symptom severity was measured weekly with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale in order to assess symptomatic remission. Survival analysis with the proportional hazards model was performed on time to remission. Manic patients were significantly more likely to achieve clinical remission than the depressed patients (100 vs. 59%) and did so significantly more rapidly. The difference in proportion remitting and time to remission between the depressed and mixed/cycling groups was not statistically significant. No significant effect for non-pharmacologic treatment assignment was found. These results point to the need to develop more effective treatments for bipolar depression. They also suggest that psychotherapy has a limited impact in the acute phase treatment of bipolar episodes.
我们试图确定双相 I 型障碍患者的抑郁发作和混合/循环发作对标准化药物治疗干预的反应是否与躁狂发作相同。作为双相情感障碍维持治疗研究(MH29618,E. 弗兰克,首席研究员)的一部分,42 名急性发病的双相 I 型障碍患者被随机分配到两种初步阶段非药物治疗策略(人际和社会节律疗法 [IPSRT] 或标准药物门诊方法)中的一种,并按照标准化药物治疗方案进行治疗。每周使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表和贝克-拉法尔森躁狂量表测量症状严重程度,以评估症状缓解情况。使用比例风险模型对缓解时间进行生存分析。躁狂患者比抑郁患者更有可能实现临床缓解(100% 对 59%),而且缓解速度明显更快。抑郁组和混合/循环组在缓解比例和缓解时间上的差异无统计学意义。未发现非药物治疗分配有显著影响。这些结果表明需要开发更有效的双相抑郁治疗方法。它们还表明心理治疗在双相发作的急性期治疗中影响有限。