Influence of liver failure, ascites, and energy expenditure on the response to oral nutrition in alcoholic liver cirrhosis.

The influence of liver failure, ascites, and energy expenditure on the response to oral nutrition was assessed in a group of 55 alcoholic cirrhotic patients. Caloric intake, nutritional status, resting energy expenditure (REE), and Child-Pugh score were evaluated before and after 1 mo of oral nutrition. Patients were severely malnourished, 73% had muscular midarm circumference (MMAC) below the 5th percentile of a reference population, 51% had triceps skinfold thickness below the 25th percentile. Eleven patients were in class A of Child, 19 in class B, and 25 in class C. Twenty-six patients were nonascitic, whereas ascites was resolved in 10 ascitic patients by the end of the study and 19 patients had refractory ascites. Liver damage was more pronounced and did not improve during the study in patients with refractory ascites. Caloric intake was approximately 40 kcal/kg of body weight and was in the same range in the three groups according to Child classification. Fat mass (FM) increased, respectively, from 17.4% +/- 1.7% to 19.5% +/- 1.4%, P < 0.01, in Child A patients; from 17.1% +/- 1.4% to 19.3% +/- 1.4%, P < 0.001, in Child B patients; and from 17.6% +/- 1.5% to 18.8% +/- 1.5%, P < 0.05, in Child C patients. The increase in FM was comparable in the three groups, whereas MMAC and the creatinine/height ratio did not change significantly. FM was lower and did not increase in patients with refractory ascites. Child C patients were characterized by an increase in the rate of glucose oxidation (P < 0.02) and a decrease in the rate of lipid oxidation (P < 0.05). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 were reliable indices of improvement of liver function in patients with severe liver failure, ApoA1 was also a marker of improvement of metabolic impairment. With respect to the measured REE/predicted REE ratio calculated according to Harris-Benedict equation (r), 19 patients were considered hypermetabolic (r < 1.1), 30 normometabolic (0.9 < r < 1.1), and 6 hypometabolic (r < 0.9). An increase in FM correlated with r (P < 0.01) and was more marked in hypermetabolic patients. In contrast to the other two groups, Child-Pugh score and nutritional status remained unchanged in the hypometabolic patients. These results show that severe liver failure did not preclude improvement of nutritional status provided caloric intake was high. In Child C patients, improvement of nutritional status paralleled improvement of liver function and normalization of oxidative metabolism. Refractory ascites had negative effects on changes in nutritional status and liver function. Despite adequate caloric intake to energy requirements, hypometabolism has a poor prognosis regarding both nutritional status and liver function.