• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[普通医学与专科医学的协调。布尔戈斯地区的评估]

[Coordination of general and specialized medicine. Evaluation in the Burgos area].

作者信息

Rivas Crespo J C, de Pablo Chinchetru R, Cordero Guevara J A, Bonilla Alonso J

机构信息

Centro de Salud García Lorca, Unidad Docente de Burgos.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 1997 Mar 31;19(5):257-61.

PMID:9264656
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the coordination between General and Specialist Medicine, its development and the causes of breakdowns.

DESIGN

Descriptive at two periods.

SETTING

Burgos Health Area.

PARTICIPANTS

All the consultation request reaching Specialist Care (SC) in January 1993 and January 1995 from all the Primary Care Centres running the Mostrador programme (23); random sample of these requests in order to evaluate the proportion of return six months after the requests and to study the data found in the interconsultation notes (ICN) returned to Primary Care (PC).

MAIN RESULTS

The percentage of requests without and appointment being made was similar. 1.21% (1993) and 1.30% (1995); the most common cause was error/lack of data. The percentage of ICN returned to PC 6 months after the requests was also similar: 24.10% (1993) and 22.03% (1995). The most frequent reason for the failure in the circuit was that the specialist "retained" the ICNs.

CONCLUSIONS

General Medical and Specialist coordination was similar in the two periods evaluated. It was adequate for the appointment-making process, but there were break-downs in communication between doctors using the ICN. The most important reasons for these failures were identified.

摘要

目的

评估全科医学与专科医学之间的协调情况、其发展以及中断原因。

设计

分两个阶段进行描述性研究。

地点

布尔戈斯健康区。

参与者

1993年1月和1995年1月所有运行“咨询台”项目的初级保健中心(共23个)向专科护理(SC)提出的所有会诊请求;对这些请求进行随机抽样,以评估请求提出六个月后的回访比例,并研究返回初级保健(PC)的会诊间记录(ICN)中的数据。

主要结果

未预约的请求百分比相似,1993年为1.21%,1995年为1.30%;最常见原因是错误/数据缺失。请求提出六个月后返回PC的ICN百分比也相似:1993年为24.10%,1995年为22.03%。流程失败最常见的原因是专科医生“扣留”了ICN。

结论

在所评估的两个阶段中,全科医学与专科医学之间的协调情况相似。在预约流程方面是足够的,但使用ICN的医生之间存在沟通中断。确定了这些失败的最重要原因。

相似文献

1
[Coordination of general and specialized medicine. Evaluation in the Burgos area].[普通医学与专科医学的协调。布尔戈斯地区的评估]
Aten Primaria. 1997 Mar 31;19(5):257-61.
2
[Does the communication between primary and secondary levels function?].[一级与二级之间的沟通是否发挥作用?]
Aten Primaria. 1996 Apr 15;17(6):376-81.
3
[Analysis of a programme of direct referral between primary and specialist care in potential surgery patients].[对潜在手术患者初级与专科护理之间直接转诊计划的分析]
Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 15;28(6):381-5. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70399-x.
4
[An evaluation of the quality of the medical information passing between primary care and specialist levels].[对基层医疗与专科医疗层面之间传递的医疗信息质量的评估]
Aten Primaria. 1993 May 15;11(8):406-11.
5
[Improvement in the quality of the interclinic referral note in regard to the information given].[关于所提供信息的诊所间转诊记录质量的改进]
Aten Primaria. 1996 Mar 31;17(5):317-20.
6
[An analysis of the interrelations of primary care-specialized care in patient referral].[患者转诊中初级保健与专科保健的相互关系分析]
Aten Primaria. 1993 Jun 30;12(2):65-8, 70.
7
[Concordance analysis of referrals from Primary Care to Mental Health].[初级保健机构至心理健康机构转诊的一致性分析]
Semergen. 2012 Sep;38(6):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
8
[Evaluation of referrals in primary care].[基层医疗中转诊的评估]
Aten Primaria. 2005 Feb 28;35(3):146-51. doi: 10.1157/13071940.
9
[The referral system: a study on relations between general practitioners and specialists].
Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr). 1994 Mar-Apr;68(2):267-78.
10
[Coordination of sectors: the suitability of principles].[部门协调:原则的适用性]
Aten Primaria. 1994 Sep 30;14(5):779-82.

引用本文的文献

1
[Evaluation of medical reports received from the second level of care].[对从二级护理机构收到的医疗报告的评估]
Aten Primaria. 2001 Apr 15;27(6):403-7. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78821-x.