Breteau D, Koutani A, Albert P, Morin N, Salvo A
Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Prog Urol. 1997 Apr;7(2):235-9.
To compare two contact and non-contact techniques using the VLAP system (visual laser ablation of the prostate).
From January 1994 to April 1995, two groups of 50 patients were included in a randomized prospective study and were treated by the contact and non-contact laser technique, respectively. These patients presented with symptomatic BPH requiring transurethral electroresection. These patients were evaluated according to subjective (AUA score) and objective criteria (maximum flow rate, transrectal and suprapubic ultrasonography). ND:YAG laser energy was delivered by a Medilas 4100 source via a lateral beam fibre. Objective success criteria were an improvement of the AUA score by at least 50% and of the maximum flow rate by at least 50% with a difference of 4 mL/s. The failure criterion was the need to perform complementary electroresection during the first 6 postoperative months.
The mortality was 2% (cardiovascular causes), and the overall morbidity (first postoperative month) was 29%, with 21% of a vesical irritation syndrome, 6% of urinary tract infection and 2% of bladder clots. The global result at 12 months showed a statistically significant postoperative improvement of the subjective and objective parameters studied preoperatively (p = 0.0001). In the contact group, the AUA score, mean maximum flow rate and residual urine, which had preoperative values of 19.1, 9.1 mL/s and 141 mL, respectively, were equal to 2.3, 15.6 mL/s and 45 mL at 12 months. In the non-contact group, the same parameters, which had preoperative values of 17.8, 9.2 mL/s and 87 mL, respectively, were equal to 3.8, 13.3 mL/s and 47 mL at 12 months. The results, evaluated as a function of objective success criteria, showed a 12-month success rate of 68% for the contact method and 61% for the non-contact method. The mean hospital stay was 6 days and the mean duration of bladder catheterization was 5 days with the two techniques. During follow-up, 7% of patients required revision by electroresection, regardless of the technique used.
this study demonstrated identical results for the contact and non-contact techniques using the VLAP system.
使用VLAP系统(可视化激光前列腺切除术)比较两种接触式和非接触式技术。
从1994年1月至1995年4月,两组各50例患者纳入一项随机前瞻性研究,分别接受接触式和非接触式激光技术治疗。这些患者均患有症状性良性前列腺增生,需要经尿道电切术。根据主观标准(美国泌尿协会评分)和客观标准(最大尿流率、经直肠和耻骨上超声检查)对这些患者进行评估。钕:钇铝石榴石激光能量由Medilas 4100光源通过侧束光纤传输。客观成功标准为美国泌尿协会评分至少提高50%,最大尿流率至少提高50%,且差值为4毫升/秒。失败标准为术后前6个月内需进行补充性电切术。
死亡率为2%(心血管原因),总体发病率(术后第一个月)为29%,其中膀胱刺激综合征占21%,尿路感染占6%,膀胱凝血块占2%。12个月时的总体结果显示,术前研究的主观和客观参数在术后有统计学显著改善(p = 0.0001)。接触组中,美国泌尿协会评分、平均最大尿流率和残余尿量在术前分别为19.1、9.1毫升/秒和141毫升,12个月时分别为2.3、15.6毫升/秒和45毫升。非接触组中,相同参数在术前分别为17.8、9.2毫升/秒和87毫升,12个月时分别为3.8、13.3毫升/秒和47毫升。根据客观成功标准评估结果显示,接触法12个月成功率为68%,非接触法为61%。两种技术的平均住院时间均为6天,平均膀胱导尿持续时间均为5天。随访期间,无论使用何种技术,7%的患者需要进行电切术修正。
本研究表明,使用VLAP系统的接触式和非接触式技术结果相同。