Soyer P, Rondeau Y, Dufresne A, Spelle L, Somveille E, Scherrer A, Rymer R
Department of Body and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, F-75475 Paris Cedex 10, France.
Eur Radiol. 1997;7(7):1048-53. doi: 10.1007/s003300050250.
The goal of our prospective study was to compare quantitatively and qualitatively in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold spoiled gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) MR imaging technique for imaging focal hepatic lesion. Thirty-eight patients with 53 focal hepatic lesions had in-phase (TR = 12.3 ms, TE = 4.2 ms) and opposed-phase (TR = 10.1 ms, TE = 1.9 ms) GRE (flip angle = 30 degrees , bandwidth +/- 32 kHz, matrix size 256 x 128, one signal average) MR imaging at 1.5 T. Images were analyzed quantitatively by measuring the lesion-to-liver contrast and for lesion detection. In addition, images were reviewed qualitatively for lesion conspicuity. Quantitatively, lesion-to-liver contrast obtained with in-phase (3. 22 +/- 1.86) and opposed-phase pulse sequence (3.72 +/- 2.32) were not statistically different (Student's t-test). No difference in sensitivity was found between in-phase and opposed-phase pulse sequence (31 of 53, sensitivity 58 % vs 30 of 53, sensitivity 57 %, respectively). Two lesions not seen with opposed-phase imaging were detected with in-phase imaging. Conversely, one lesion not seen on in-phase imaging was detected on opposed-phase imaging so that the combination of in-phase and opposed-phase imaging yielded detection of 32 of 53 lesions (sensitivity 60 %). Qualitatively, lesion conspicuity was similar with both techniques. However, in-phase images showed better lesion conspicuity than opposed-phase images in 9 cases, and opposed-phase images showed better lesion conspicuity than in-phase images in 7 cases. No definite advantage (at a significant level) emerged between in-phase and opposed-phase spoiled GRE imaging. Because differences in lesion conspicuity and lesion detection may be observed with the two techniques in individual cases, MR evaluation of patients with focal hepatic lesion should include both in-phase and opposed-phase spoiled GRE imaging.
我们前瞻性研究的目的是对用于局灶性肝病变成像的同相位和反相位T1加权屏气扰相梯度回波(GRE)磁共振成像技术进行定量和定性比较。38例患有53个局灶性肝病变的患者在1.5T磁场下接受了同相位(TR = 12.3ms,TE = 4.2ms)和反相位(TR = 10.1ms,TE = 1.9ms)的GRE(翻转角 = 30度,带宽+/- 32kHz,矩阵大小256×128,单次信号平均)磁共振成像。通过测量病变与肝脏的对比度对图像进行定量分析,并用于病变检测。此外,对图像进行定性评估以观察病变的清晰度。定量分析显示,同相位(3.22 +/- 1.86)和反相位脉冲序列(3.72 +/- 2.32)获得的病变与肝脏对比度无统计学差异(Student t检验)。同相位和反相位脉冲序列之间的敏感性无差异(分别为53个病变中的31个,敏感性58%和53个病变中的30个,敏感性57%)。反相位成像未显示的2个病变在同相位成像中被检测到。相反,同相位成像未显示的1个病变在反相位成像中被检测到,因此同相位和反相位成像相结合可检测到53个病变中的32个(敏感性60%)。定性分析表明,两种技术的病变清晰度相似。然而,9例中同相位图像显示的病变清晰度优于反相位图像,7例中反相位图像显示的病变清晰度优于同相位图像。同相位和反相位扰相GRE成像之间未出现明确的优势(在显著水平上)。由于在个别病例中两种技术在病变清晰度和病变检测方面可能存在差异,对局灶性肝病变患者的磁共振评估应包括同相位和反相位扰相GRE成像。