Rohatagi S, Kan S, Derendorf H
College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Pharmazie. 1997 Jul;52(7):529-32.
Non-compartmental analysis is routinely used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters such as area under the curve (AUC), area under the first moment curve (AUMC), clearance (CL), mean residence time (MRT), terminal half life (t1/2) and volume of distribution (Vd). These parameters are important to define the fate of a drug after administration by a particular route. It is well known that the AUC after a single dose is equivalent to that after multiple dose at steady state during one dosing interval. However, this relationship is not true for AUMC. Hence, it is not possible to calculate MRT as the ratio of AUMC and AUC from multiple dose data. It was the purpose of this presentation to evaluate the calculation of MRT for single and multiple dosing after intravenous and oral administration and compare two different approaches to determine MRT from multiple dose data. The results show that after multiple dosing MRT is most reliably determined by continuous sampling after the end of the last dosing interval until no more drug can be detected.
非房室分析通常用于确定药代动力学参数,如曲线下面积(AUC)、一阶矩曲线下面积(AUMC)、清除率(CL)、平均驻留时间(MRT)、末端半衰期(t1/2)和分布容积(Vd)。这些参数对于确定药物经特定给药途径给药后的转归非常重要。众所周知,单剂量给药后的AUC与多剂量给药稳态下一个给药间隔期的AUC相当。然而,这种关系对于AUMC并不成立。因此,无法根据多剂量数据将MRT计算为AUMC与AUC的比值。本报告的目的是评估静脉注射和口服给药后单剂量和多剂量给药的MRT计算,并比较从多剂量数据确定MRT的两种不同方法。结果表明,多次给药后,通过在最后一个给药间隔期结束后持续采样直至检测不到更多药物,MRT的测定最为可靠。