Spiess B D, Wall M H, Gillies B S, Fitch J C, Soltow L O, Chandler W L
University of Washington, Department of Anesthesiology, Seattle, 98195, USA.
Thromb Haemost. 1997 Aug;78(2):820-6.
Thromboelastography (TEG) has been used after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to diagnose excessive postoperative hemorrhage. Conventional TEG during CPB is not possible due to the sensitivity of the TEG to even small amounts of heparin, which produces a nondiagnostic tracing. The purpose of this study was to compare heparin neutralization using heparinase or protamine in TEG blood samples obtained during CPB. TEG testing was performed on 48 patients before, during and after CPB. Tissue plasminogen activator activity and antigen were measured on a subset of 32 patients. We found: 1) heparinase neutralized at least 10 IU/ml heparin while 1.6 ug/ml protamine neutralized up to 7 IU/ml heparin, 2) in samples with complete heparin neutralization by both methods, there was no significant difference in the R values, 3) while there was good correlation for other TEG parameters between heparinase and protamine treated samples, heparinase treatment produced shorter K values and higher angle, MA and A60, 4) while fibrinolysis was detected using both methods, heparinase treatment suppressed fibrinolysis in the TEG in both samples from patients and after in vitro addition of tissue plasminogen activator, 5) TEG was not a sensitive indicator of t-PA activity, detecting only 21% of samples with increased t-PA activity during bypass, and 5) heparinase was at least 100 times more expensive than protamine. We conclude that while both heparinase and protamine can be used to neutralize heparin in TEG samples obtained during CPB, protamine neutralization is more sensitive to fibrinolysis and less expensive, but the protamine dose must be carefully selected to match the heparin level used at individual institutions.
血栓弹力图(TEG)已用于体外循环(CPB)后诊断术后过度出血。由于TEG对少量肝素敏感,CPB期间无法进行传统的TEG检测,因为这会产生无法诊断的描记图。本研究的目的是比较在CPB期间获得的TEG血样中使用肝素酶或鱼精蛋白进行肝素中和的效果。对48例患者在CPB前、期间和之后进行TEG检测。对32例患者的一个亚组测量组织纤溶酶原激活物活性和抗原。我们发现:1)肝素酶可中和至少10 IU/ml肝素,而1.6 μg/ml鱼精蛋白可中和高达7 IU/ml肝素;2)在两种方法均实现完全肝素中和的样本中,R值无显著差异;3)虽然肝素酶和鱼精蛋白处理的样本之间其他TEG参数具有良好的相关性,但肝素酶处理产生较短的K值以及更高的角度、MA和A60;4)虽然两种方法均检测到纤溶,但肝素酶处理在患者样本以及体外添加组织纤溶酶原激活物后均抑制了TEG中的纤溶;5)TEG不是t-PA活性的敏感指标,在体外循环期间仅检测到21%的t-PA活性增加的样本;5)肝素酶的成本至少比鱼精蛋白高100倍。我们得出结论,虽然肝素酶和鱼精蛋白均可用于中和CPB期间获得的TEG样本中的肝素,但鱼精蛋白中和对纤溶更敏感且成本更低,但必须仔细选择鱼精蛋白剂量以匹配各机构使用的肝素水平。