Müller-Tegethoff K, Kersten B, Kasper P, Müller L
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Berlin, Germany.
Mutat Res. 1997 Aug 1;392(1-2):125-38. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1218(97)00051-7.
The investigation of micronuclei in mitogenic stimulated hepatocytes in vitro is a quite new area of research. Nevertheless, a relatively large database comprising more than 40 tested compounds of various classes has been generated up to now. This paper reviews the available data for the in vitro rat hepatocyte micronucleus assay, showing a sensitivity of this assay in identifying mutagens and genotoxic liver carcinogens of about 85%. Additionally, all of the tested non-carcinogens gave negative results. The use of primary hepatocytes instead of permanently dividing mammalian cell lines for the investigation of micronucleus induction has several advantages. (1) The broad spectrum of metabolizing enzymes expressed in primary hepatocytes ensures an adequate activation of most xenobiotics. (2) No transfer of activated metabolites via the culture medium is necessary in this system, since the metabolizing cells are the target cells themselves. (3) Whilst in experiments with permanently dividing cells the use of S9-mix restricts the treatment period with the test compounds to 2-6 h in the hepatocyte micronucleus assay continuous treatment of up to 48 h is possible. Investigations with the pyrrolizidine alkaloids retrorsine, monocrotaline and isatidine, strong mutagens and liver carcinogens, clearly showed that at least for isatidine a prolonged exposure period is essential to detect its mutagenic potential. This compound gave positive results in rat hepatocytes but not in V79-cells/S9-mix cultures. (4) The results obtained with the hepatocyte micronucleus assay are in good agreement with the genotoxic profiles of most of the compounds tested. Only three polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons led to 'false-negative' results, since they strongly inhibited hepatocyte proliferation and thereby prevented micronucleus formation. (5) Hepatocytes are target cells of special interest when compounds are investigated which act specifically in the liver. Especially for hepatocarcinogens classified as non-genotoxins in standard genotoxicity tests or for chemicals showing DNA-repair induction in hepatocytes but no mutagenicity in standard tests, the hepatocyte micronucleus assay can contribute to clarify the situation. (6) The rat hepatocyte micronucleus assay can be performed easily and without great efforts in parallel to the in vitro hepatocyte DNA repair test (UDS-test), using the same hepatocyte batches. (7) Similar to the two versions of the UDS-test, the hepatocyte micronucleus assay can be performed following an in vivo-in vitro protocol. In order to further validate the hepatocyte micronucleus assay, as a next step controlled interlaboratory studies should be initiated.
体外有丝分裂原刺激的肝细胞中的微核研究是一个相当新的研究领域。然而,到目前为止,已经建立了一个相对较大的数据库,包含40多种各类经测试的化合物。本文综述了体外大鼠肝细胞微核试验的现有数据,表明该试验在识别诱变剂和遗传毒性肝致癌物方面的敏感性约为85%。此外,所有测试的非致癌物均给出阴性结果。使用原代肝细胞而非永久分裂的哺乳动物细胞系来研究微核诱导具有几个优点。(1) 原代肝细胞中表达的广泛代谢酶谱确保了大多数外源化合物的充分活化。(2) 在该系统中无需通过培养基转移活化的代谢产物,因为代谢细胞本身就是靶细胞。(3) 在使用永久分裂细胞的实验中,在肝细胞微核试验中使用S9混合物会将测试化合物的处理时间限制在2 - 6小时,而在此试验中连续处理长达48小时是可能的。对吡咯里西啶生物碱倒千里光碱、野百合碱和异翅柄碱(强诱变剂和肝致癌物)的研究清楚地表明,至少对于异翅柄碱而言,延长暴露时间对于检测其诱变潜力至关重要。该化合物在大鼠肝细胞中给出阳性结果,但在V79细胞/S9混合物培养物中未给出阳性结果。(4) 肝细胞微核试验获得的结果与大多数测试化合物的遗传毒性谱高度一致。只有三种多环芳烃导致了“假阴性”结果,因为它们强烈抑制肝细胞增殖,从而阻止了微核形成。(5) 当研究在肝脏中特异性起作用的化合物时,肝细胞是特别感兴趣的靶细胞。特别是对于在标准遗传毒性试验中被归类为非遗传毒素的肝致癌物或在肝细胞中显示DNA修复诱导但在标准试验中无诱变性的化学物质,肝细胞微核试验有助于阐明情况。(6) 大鼠肝细胞微核试验可以很容易且不费力地与体外肝细胞DNA修复试验(UDS试验)并行进行,使用相同批次的肝细胞。(7) 与UDS试验的两个版本类似,肝细胞微核试验可以按照体内 - 体外方案进行。为了进一步验证肝细胞微核试验,下一步应启动对照的实验室间研究。