Dhingra-Kumar N, Sharma A K, Madan N
Department of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences, Shahdara, Delhi, India.
Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(3):223-8.
The safety of blood transfusion has attained tremendous importance because of the problems posed by acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other transfusion-transmissible diseases. While performing screening tests for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies in donated blood is indispensable, it is also essential to introduce an effective quality assurance programme covering inspection of specimens, review of record-keeping, maintenance of equipment, and verification of results. We carried out an analysis of such quality assurance programmes during routine annual inspection of 11 blood transfusion centres in Delhi, India. The following parameters were studied: standardization of sample collection and handling; adherence to the recommended technical procedure; use of standard operating procedure; proper use of test reagents; laboratory record-keeping; proper handling of HIV-positive blood units; recording and communication of results; observation of safety guidelines; equipment quality control; and training of staff. A pretested closed-type questionnaire with a weighted scoring system was used for evaluation. Performance for each parameter was graded as follows: 76-100%, excellent; 51-75%, good; 26-50%, fair; and < 25%, poor. Centres were categorized according to the total score obtained for all parameters. Overall performance > 50% was considered satisfactory. Of the 11 centres, none was excellent overall, five were considered satisfactory, and six were unsatisfactory.
由于获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)和其他输血传播疾病所带来的问题,输血安全已变得极为重要。虽然对献血进行人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体筛查测试是必不可少的,但引入一个涵盖标本检查、记录保存审查、设备维护以及结果验证的有效质量保证计划也至关重要。我们在对印度德里的11个输血中心进行年度例行检查期间,对这类质量保证计划进行了分析。研究了以下参数:样本采集和处理的标准化;遵守推荐的技术程序;使用标准操作程序;正确使用测试试剂;实验室记录保存;对HIV阳性血液单位的妥善处理;结果的记录与传达;安全准则的遵守情况;设备质量控制;以及工作人员培训。使用了一份带有加权评分系统的预先测试的封闭式问卷进行评估。每个参数的表现分级如下:76 - 100%,优秀;51 - 75%,良好;26 - 50%,中等;< 25%,差。各中心根据所有参数获得的总分进行分类。总体表现> 50%被认为是令人满意的。在这11个中心中,没有一个整体表现优秀,5个被认为令人满意,6个不令人满意。