Simas M L, Santos N A, Thiers F A
LabVis-UFPE, Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1997 May;30(5):633-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x1997000500010.
This study compares contrast thresholds for sinewave gratings, or spatial frequencies (1/CSF) with contrast thresholds for angular frequencies (1/aCSF) and for radial frequencies, or Jzero targets (1/rCSF). Observers had to differentiate between one of these frequency stimuli and a stimulus at mean luminance within a forced-choice procedure. All measurements were made with the same equipment, methods and subjects. Our results show higher sensitivity to, or lower thresholds for, angular frequencies when compared to either sinewave gratings or Jzero targets. Contrast values in arbitrary units, in the lower threshold range for angular frequencies, were about half those required to differentiate sinewave gratings from mean luminance in its most sensitive range.
本研究比较了正弦波光栅的对比度阈值,即空间频率(1/CSF)与角频率(1/aCSF)以及径向频率(即J零目标,1/rCSF)的对比度阈值。观察者必须在强制选择程序中区分这些频率刺激之一与平均亮度的刺激。所有测量均使用相同的设备、方法和受试者。我们的结果表明,与正弦波光栅或J零目标相比,对角频率的敏感度更高,或阈值更低。在角频率的较低阈值范围内,以任意单位表示的对比度值约为在其最敏感范围内区分正弦波光栅与平均亮度所需值的一半。