Hoddinott P, Pill R
Department of General Practice, Health Centre, Llanedeyrn, Cardiff, UK.
Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):307-12. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.307.
This study looked look at the role of the GP as a qualitative research interviewer and aimed to illustrate areas of methodological difficulty using personal observations made during a qualitative study in general practice.
The recently published literature on qualitative research in general practice was reviewed by the author to inform her own qualitative study looking at how women decide how to feed their babies. Some women in the study were patients of the author; some knew that she is a GP but were registered at another practice and some did not know that she is a doctor. In-depth and semi-structured interviews were tape recorded and transcribed. Observations about combining general practice and qualitative research were recorded by the author in a research diary.
Qualitative research is being advocated as a methodology appropriate for general practice, yet there are many unanswered questions about methodological detail. There are no guidelines to help GPs to decide whether it is appropriate for them to do the interviewing, the practicalities of doing it, and whether they should use their own patients. There is clearly a need for more methodological research to look at how these decisions influence the data and to inform GPs who are considering a qualitative study.
本研究探讨全科医生作为定性研究访谈者的角色,并旨在通过在一项全科医疗定性研究中的个人观察来说明方法上的难点领域。
作者查阅了近期发表的关于全科医疗定性研究的文献,以指导她自己关于女性如何决定喂养婴儿方式的定性研究。该研究中的一些女性是作者的患者;一些人知道她是全科医生,但在其他诊所注册;还有一些人不知道她是医生。深入的半结构化访谈进行了录音和转录。作者在研究日记中记录了关于将全科医疗与定性研究相结合的观察结果。
定性研究被倡导为适用于全科医疗的一种方法,但在方法细节方面仍有许多未解决的问题。没有指导方针来帮助全科医生决定他们是否适合进行访谈、进行访谈的实际操作以及他们是否应该使用自己的患者。显然需要更多的方法学研究来探讨这些决定如何影响数据,并为考虑进行定性研究的全科医生提供信息。