Suppr超能文献

阿司咪唑与氯雷他定治疗常年性变应性鼻炎的平行组对照研究。

A parallel-group comparison of astemizole and loratadine for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

al-Muhaimeed H

机构信息

Department of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, King Abdul Aziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;25(4):175-81. doi: 10.1177/030006059702500401.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of the two antihistamines, astemizole and loratadine, were compared in a double-blind study of 84 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Patients were randomized to receive orally either astemizole 10 mg once daily (n = 40) or loratadine 10 mg once daily (n = 44) for 1 week. No other antirhinitis medication was allowed during the study. By day 7 the mean daily symptom scores, recorded on diary cards, were lower in patients receiving astemizole than in those receiving loratadine for runny nose, itchy nose and sneezing, although not for blocked nose, and treatment differences only reached statistical significance for runny nose. After 7 days, 53.75% of patients on astemizole and 38.6% on loratadine were free of symptoms, and 87% of patients on astemizole described the treatment as good or excellent compared with 62% on loratadine. The present results suggest that astemizole may be more effective than loratadine in controlling symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis.

摘要

在一项针对84例常年性变应性鼻炎患者的双盲研究中,比较了两种抗组胺药阿司咪唑和氯雷他定的疗效和安全性。患者被随机分为两组,一组口服阿司咪唑10毫克,每日一次(n = 40),另一组口服氯雷他定10毫克,每日一次(n = 44),为期1周。研究期间不允许使用其他抗鼻炎药物。到第7天时,记录在日记卡上的每日平均症状评分显示,接受阿司咪唑治疗的患者在流涕、鼻痒和打喷嚏方面的评分低于接受氯雷他定治疗的患者,不过鼻塞症状方面并非如此,且仅流涕症状的治疗差异具有统计学意义。7天后,服用阿司咪唑的患者中有53.75%无症状,服用氯雷他定的患者中有38.6%无症状,并且服用阿司咪唑的患者中有87%认为治疗效果良好或极佳,而服用氯雷他定的患者中这一比例为62%。目前的结果表明,在控制常年性变应性鼻炎症状方面,阿司咪唑可能比氯雷他定更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验