• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement in patients with an implantable defibrillator.

作者信息

Strickberger S A, Daoud E G, Davidson T, Weiss R, Bogun F, Knight B P, Bahu M, Goyal R, Man K C, Morady F

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Ctr, Ann Arbor 48109-0022, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1997 Aug 19;96(4):1217-23. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1217.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1217
PMID:9286952
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The probability of successful defibrillation has been determined in normal animals but not in patients undergoing defibrillator implantation. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective study was to determine the probability of successful defibrillation in humans on the basis of a step-down defibrillation energy requirement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-three consecutive patients underwent five separate inductions of ventricular fibrillation after the defibrillation energy requirement was determined with the use of small decrements and a step-down protocol (20, 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0.8 J). The first shock energy for defibrillation was either 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, or 2.0 times the defibrillation energy requirement, and the likelihoods of successful defibrillation were 70+/-27%, 84+/-12%, 86+/-25%, 80+/-29%, and 88+/-32%, respectively (P=.03). The frequencies of uniformly successful defibrillation (5 of 5 defibrillation attempts) were 30%, 27%, 60%, 64%, and 73%, respectively (P=.01). Seven patients in whom the defibrillation energy requirement was <4 J had an overall rate of successful defibrillation of 54+/-20% compared with 86+/-20% in the remaining 47 patients (P=.002). The likelihood of successful defibrillation at twice the defibrillation energy requirement was 98% in the 46 patients with a defibrillation energy requirement of >4 J and 67% in the 7 patients with a defibrillation energy requirement of <4 J (P=.17). An absolute safety margin of 7 J was associated with a 96% probability of successful defibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of successful defibrillation is 70% at the defibrillation energy requirement. The probability plateaus at 88%, at twice the defibrillation energy requirement. A 96% probability of successful defibrillation is achieved at an absolute safety margin of 7 J, and a 98% success rate is achieved at energies that are twice the defibrillation energy requirement if the defibrillation energy requirement is >4 J. If the defibrillation energy requirement is <4 J, larger multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement are needed to achieve a high probability of successful defibrillation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement in patients with an implantable defibrillator.
Circulation. 1997 Aug 19;96(4):1217-23. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1217.
2
A prospective evaluation of two defibrillation safety margin techniques in patients with low defibrillation energy requirements.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 Jan;9(1):41-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00865.x.
3
Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.双线圈与单线圈主动式胸壁植入式除颤器导线系统:除颤能量需求以及在除颤能量需求倍数下的除颤成功概率
Europace. 2001 Jul;3(3):177-80. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2001.0169.
4
Prospective randomized comparison of two defibrillation safety margins in unipolar, active pectoral defibrillator therapy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;26(2 Pt 1):613-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00102.x.
5
Relationship between shock energy and postdefibrillation ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable defibrillators.植入式心脏除颤器患者电击能量与除颤后室性心律失常的关系。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999 Mar;10(3):370-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00685.x.
6
Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.易损性上限是经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的人类患者中与90%成功除颤概率相关的电击强度的良好估计指标。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00603-6.
7
Defibrillation energy requirements using a left anterior chest cutaneous to subcutaneous shocking vector: implications for a total subcutaneous implantable defibrillator.使用左前胸皮肤至皮下电击向量时的除颤能量需求:对完全皮下植入式除颤器的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2005 Dec;2(12):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.09.007.
8
Predictors of successful defibrillation threshold test during CRT-D implantation.预测 CRT-D 植入期间除颤阈值测试成功的因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 May;68(5):512-8.
9
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
10
Use of multiple patches during implantation of epicardial defibrillator systems.心外膜除颤器系统植入过程中多个贴片的使用。
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Jan 1;71(1):68-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90712-l.

引用本文的文献

1
The "Defibrillation Testing, Why Not?" survey. Testing of subcutaneous and transvenous defibrillators in the Italian clinical practice.“除颤测试,为何不做?”调查。意大利临床实践中皮下和经静脉除颤器的测试。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Jan 11;38:100952. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100952. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
The Saga of Defibrillation Testing: When Less Is More.除颤测试的传奇:少即是多。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 May 5;20(6):44. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0987-6.
3
Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.
内部除颤电击引起的电穿孔,有无完整兔心复跳。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Aug 15;303(4):H439-49. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01121.2011. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
4
Incidence and clinical predictors of low defibrillation safety margin at time of implantable defibrillator implantation.植入式心脏除颤器植入时低除颤安全裕度的发生率及临床预测因素
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;34(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9648-z. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
High-energy defibrillation increases the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization.高能除颤会增加局部心室复极的离散度。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Nov;32(2):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9589-6. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Attenuation of post-shock increases in brain natriuretic Peptide with post shock overdrive pacing.休克后通过超速起搏减轻脑钠肽升高。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Mar 5;10(3):122-38.
7
Azygos vein lead implantation for high defibrillation thresholds in implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.在植入式心脏复律除颤器放置中,奇静脉导联植入用于高除颤阈值情况。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Jan 7;10(1):49-54.
8
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2000 Jan;11 Suppl 1:49-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03042525.
9
[Single- and dual-chamber ICDs: Are there still significant differences compared to pacemakers with regard to implantation and follow-up?].[单腔和双腔植入式心律转复除颤器:与起搏器相比,在植入和随访方面是否仍存在显著差异?]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008 Dec;19 Suppl 1:6-13. doi: 10.1007/s00399-008-0610-4.
10
A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex.右心室流出道与右心室心尖部除颤阈值的随机对照比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;22(3):221-5. doi: 10.1007/s10840-008-9254-x. Epub 2008 May 10.