Hurley J, Lomas J, Goldsmith L J
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Milbank Q. 1997;75(3):343-64. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00059.
Global expenditure budgets in the fee-for-service physician sector create management problems for both funders and physicians. Global expenditure cap policies must be designed, and appropriate institutional structures created, to mitigate perverse utilization incentives, manage collective utilization, and diffuse the internal professional and the funder-profession tensions created by a capped budget. Two Canadian provinces that adopted different approaches to the design of their physician expenditure cap policies experienced different outcomes in utilization growth. The outcomes, however, are the opposite to what one would predict based on an analysis of the incentive structures embodied in the two provinces' policies. An analytic framework developed for the study of common-property resources is applied to the differing physician responses to global budgets across the two provinces. The insights offered by this framework can guide policy design for global physician budgets, and they indicate the critical importance of physician acceptance of such a policy.
按服务收费的医生行业的全球支出预算给资金提供者和医生都带来了管理问题。必须设计全球支出上限政策,并建立适当的制度结构,以减轻不当的使用激励措施,管理集体使用情况,并缓解由预算上限造成的内部专业紧张关系以及资金提供者与专业人员之间的紧张关系。加拿大的两个省份在设计医生支出上限政策时采用了不同的方法,在使用增长方面经历了不同的结果。然而,结果与根据对这两个省份政策中所体现的激励结构进行分析所预测的情况相反。一个为研究公共资源而开发的分析框架被应用于两个省份医生对全球预算的不同反应。这个框架提供的见解可以指导全球医生预算的政策设计,并且它们表明了医生接受这种政策的至关重要性。