Suppr超能文献

儿科风险指标:儿童损伤严重程度的客观测量方法。

Pediatric risk indicator: an objective measurement of childhood injury severity.

作者信息

Tepas J J, Veldenz H C, Discala C, Pieper P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Health Science Center Jacksonville, 32209, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):258-61; discussion 261-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199708000-00009.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Pediatric Risk Index (PRI) uses established measures of physiologic derangement (Pediatric Trauma Score and Glasgow Coma Scale) and anatomic severity (Injury Severity Score) to identify those patients at risk of death, impairment, or extensive resource utilization.

METHODS

The PRI was evaluated by analysis of 5,345 patients entered into a multi-institutional pediatric trauma registry during 1993. PRI was calculated for each patient, and its distribution for survivors compared with those of fatalities. Analysis of this distribution identified a risk discriminant which was used to compare resulting cohorts by mortality, intensive care unit stay, and discharge impairment as measured by Functional Independence Measure. To evaluate the PRI's ability to identify unexpected outcome the records of 7,319 children injured in 1992 were then compared to the "standards" developed from the 1993 data.

RESULTS

Mortality distribution analysis identified a PRI > 1 as an indication of injury related risk. For mortality, intensive care unit stay, and discharge Functional Independence Measurement, there was a statistically significant difference (chi2, p < 0.001) between the at-risk and no-risk populations. Comparison of 1992 experience demonstrated at least one potentially preventable death.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRI effectively identifies injured patients at risk for dying, impairment, or extensive intensive care unit care.

摘要

引言

儿童风险指数(PRI)采用既定的生理紊乱指标(儿童创伤评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表)和解剖严重程度指标(损伤严重程度评分)来识别那些有死亡、功能障碍或大量资源使用风险的患者。

方法

通过对1993年纳入多机构儿童创伤登记处的5345例患者进行分析来评估PRI。计算每位患者的PRI,并将幸存者的PRI分布与死亡者的进行比较。对该分布的分析确定了一个风险判别指标,用于通过死亡率、重症监护病房住院时间以及用功能独立性测量法衡量的出院时功能障碍情况来比较所得队列。为了评估PRI识别意外结果的能力,随后将1992年受伤的7319名儿童的记录与从1993年数据得出的“标准”进行比较。

结果

死亡率分布分析确定PRI>1表明存在与损伤相关的风险。对于死亡率、重症监护病房住院时间和出院时的功能独立性测量,有风险人群和无风险人群之间存在统计学显著差异(卡方检验,p<0.001)。对1992年情况的比较显示至少有一例可能可预防的死亡。

结论

PRI能有效识别有死亡、功能障碍或大量重症监护病房护理风险的受伤患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验