Suppr超能文献

神经临床试验中的伦理考量

Ethical considerations in neuroclinical trials.

作者信息

Macciocchi S N, Alves W A

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 1997;20(3):161-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01105559.

Abstract

Ethical decision making in clinical trials has become increasingly emphasized at many levels of the review process. Ethical concepts applicable to Neuroclinical Trials (NCT) are reviewed. The discussion is directed towards ethical concerns that investigators must consider and justify prior to Institutional Review Board (IRB) submission. Risk-benefit analysis, methodology (randomization: placebo; design) and consent (informed; deferred; waived) are reviewed and Office for Protection from Research Risk (OPRR) guidelines are described. Our conclusions: Investigators proposing NCT face increasing ethical scrutiny by IRBs. Attention to ethical issues early in trial planning process is recommended.

摘要

在临床试验的多个审查层面,伦理决策已日益受到重视。本文回顾了适用于神经临床试验(NCT)的伦理概念。讨论聚焦于研究人员在向机构审查委员会(IRB)提交申请之前必须考虑并作出合理说明的伦理问题。文中回顾了风险效益分析、方法学(随机分组:安慰剂;设计)及同意(知情同意;延迟同意;豁免同意)等内容,并描述了研究风险保护办公室(OPRR)的指导方针。我们的结论是:提出进行神经临床试验的研究人员面临来自机构审查委员会日益严格的伦理审查。建议在试验规划过程的早期就关注伦理问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验