Williams R, Hunt K
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, University of Glasgow.
Psychol Med. 1997 Sep;27(5):1173-81. doi: 10.1017/s0033291797005473.
This paper seeks to explain an excess of psychological distress previously found among groups of British South Asians (with ancestry from the Indian subcontinent) living in Glasgow, compared with the general population. The excess was found on a psychosomatic measure and a measure of self-assessed distress but not on a clinically validated measure (the General Health Questionnaire or GHQ). The paper investigates whether South Asians are subject to stressful situations to which the GHQ is less sensitive than the other two measures.
Random samples of 159 South Asians aged 30-40, mean age 35, and 319 from the general population, all aged 35, were interviewed in Glasgow, using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), a psychosomatic symptom scale (PSS) and a self-assessment of distress. Subcultural groupings were differentiated by South Asian origin, English fluency, religion, and gender. Stressful situations assessed were experience of assault, stress/dissatisfaction with work, overcrowding, low standard of living, absence of family and absence of confidants.
The GHQ-12 was less sensitive to certain stressful situations than the other two measures. The PSS and/or self-assessed distress were more sensitive to low standard of living, self-rated stress in work around the house and possibly experience of assault. In a combined analysis, the relation between distress on the PSS or self-assessed measure and subcultural groupings became nonsignificant, while the relation between distress and key stressful situations remained significant.
The greater distress of women, Muslims and limited English speakers is largely explained by the stressful situations they experience. The GHQ-12 under-estimates distress related to situations experienced particularly by ethnic minorities and by women.
本文旨在解释先前在居住于格拉斯哥的英属南亚人群(祖籍为印度次大陆)中发现的心理困扰过多的现象,该群体与普通人群相比存在这一情况。这种过多现象在一项心身测量指标和一项自我评估困扰的指标上有所体现,但在一项经过临床验证的指标(一般健康问卷或GHQ)上并未出现。本文研究南亚人群是否面临一些应激情况,而GHQ对这些情况的敏感度低于其他两项指标。
在格拉斯哥对159名年龄在30至40岁(平均年龄35岁)的南亚人和319名年龄均为35岁的普通人群进行随机抽样访谈,使用12项一般健康问卷(GHQ - 12)、一项心身症状量表(PSS)以及一项困扰自我评估。亚文化分组根据南亚血统、英语流利程度、宗教信仰和性别进行区分。所评估的应激情况包括遭受攻击的经历、工作压力/不满、过度拥挤、低生活水平、缺乏家人以及缺乏知己。
GHQ - 12对某些应激情况的敏感度低于其他两项指标。PSS和/或自我评估困扰对低生活水平、在家务工作中的自评压力以及可能的遭受攻击经历更为敏感。在综合分析中,PSS或自我评估指标上的困扰与亚文化分组之间的关系变得不显著,而困扰与关键应激情况之间的关系仍然显著。
女性、穆斯林和英语能力有限者所面临的更大困扰在很大程度上可由他们所经历的应激情况来解释。GHQ - 12低估了与少数民族和女性尤其经历的情况相关的困扰。