Lyons A R
Department of Orthopaedic and Accident Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Am J Med. 1997 Aug 18;103(2A):51S-63S; discussion 63S-64S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90027-9.
The worldwide prevalence of hip fracture is increasing as the mean age of the population increases. Despite advances in anesthesia, nursing care, and surgical techniques, however, the outcome of treatment is often poor, and hip fractures remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality for the elderly population. For these patients, operative treatment is considered to be optimal and most cost-effective for displaced intracapsular fractures and all extracapsular fractures. Undisplaced intracapsular fractures can be treated with bed rest and 6-8 weeks' delay of weight bearing in the "younger" elderly (< or = 70 years). The timing of surgery remains controversial, and evidence that a delay in operating leads to increased morbidity is inconclusive. In general, early surgery is indicated in premorbidly fit patients, whereas surgery should be delayed if correctable comorbidities are present. Methods of intracapsular fracture repair very geographically and according to surgeon preference. Prospective, randomized, case-controlled studies are needed to compare repair methods, including internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular fractures and use of uncemented versus cemented hemiarthroplasty protheses. Extracapsular fractures are usually repaired using a dynamic hip screw or other variant of sliding nail fixation. The mortality rate after hip fracture appears to vary in association with poorly controlled systemic disease (particularly if multiple comorbidities are present); cognitive disorders; operative intervention before stabilization if > or = 3 comorbidities are present; and, in the absence of prophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis; the associations between mortality and male sex, advanced age, and anesthetic type are less clear. The factors associated with the recovery of walking ability include young age, male sex, absence of dementia, absence of postoperative confusional state, and use of a walking aid before the fracture. Many determinants of outcome are independent of the level of care given and are dependent on prefracture status. To maximize rehabilitation potential, a multidisciplinary approach using skilled medical, nursing, and paramedical care appears to be optimal. Prospective case-controlled studies are required to demonstrate the long-term effectiveness of specialist rehabilitation units. In today's cost-cutting environment, caution must be taken to prevent short-term cost-saving measures from compromising long-term outcome for elderly hip fracture patients.
随着全球人口平均年龄的增长,髋部骨折的患病率正在上升。然而,尽管在麻醉、护理和手术技术方面取得了进展,但治疗结果往往不佳,髋部骨折仍然是老年人群发病和死亡的重要原因。对于这些患者,手术治疗被认为是治疗移位性囊内骨折和所有囊外骨折的最佳且最具成本效益的方法。对于“较年轻”的老年人(≤70岁),无移位的囊内骨折可采用卧床休息和6至8周的负重延迟治疗。手术时机仍存在争议,且手术延迟会导致发病率增加的证据尚无定论。一般来说,术前健康状况良好的患者应尽早手术,而如果存在可纠正的合并症,则应延迟手术。囊内骨折的修复方法因地区和外科医生的偏好而异。需要进行前瞻性、随机、病例对照研究来比较修复方法,包括囊内骨折的内固定与半髋关节置换术,以及非骨水泥型与骨水泥型半髋关节置换假体的使用。囊外骨折通常使用动力髋螺钉或其他滑动钉固定变体进行修复。髋部骨折后的死亡率似乎与全身疾病控制不佳(特别是如果存在多种合并症)、认知障碍、如果存在≥3种合并症则在病情稳定前进行手术干预以及在没有预防措施的情况下发生深静脉血栓形成有关;死亡率与男性、高龄和麻醉类型之间的关联尚不清楚。与步行能力恢复相关的因素包括年轻、男性、无痴呆、无术后意识模糊状态以及骨折前使用助行器。许多预后决定因素与所提供的护理水平无关,而取决于骨折前的状态。为了最大限度地发挥康复潜力,采用熟练的医疗、护理和辅助医疗护理的多学科方法似乎是最佳选择。需要进行前瞻性病例对照研究来证明专科康复单位的长期有效性。在当今削减成本的环境中,必须谨慎行事,以防止短期成本节约措施损害老年髋部骨折患者的长期预后。