Suppr超能文献

预分发试剂和非离心法用于高密度脂蛋白胆固醇测量的性能

Performance of predispensed reagent and noncentrifugation methods for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement.

作者信息

Zhang D J, LaRue S, Miller W G, Cole T G

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commanwealth University, Richmond 23298-0286, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Sep;121(9):938-47.

PMID:9302925
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol methods with predispensed reagent (SPINPRO, ISO Spin, Vitros, and One Shots) and noncentrifugation separation (Magnetic-HDL) compared with traditional high-density lipoprotein cholesterol methods (PBI Plus, Boehringer-Mannheim, and Abbott).

DESIGN

Precision was evaluated by running two concentrations of frozen human sera and two concentrations of lyophilized quality control material according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document EP5-T2. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing sample results achieved by each method with those by the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network Designated Comparison Method and the Lipid Research Clinics' heparin-Mn++ method. Sera from donors with high triglyceride levels were used to challenge the ability of each method to measure lipemic samples for each method.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic and university medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty-two ambulatory donors with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels ranging from 30 to 102 mg/dL, cholesterol levels ranging from 107 to 679 mg/dL, and triglyceride levels ranging from 20 to 2450 mg/dL.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Precision, accuracy, linearity, and ability to measure lipemic samples.

RESULTS

Imprecision varied from CV 1.4% to 8.6%. The mean absolute bias for each method versus the Designated Comparison Method ranged from 2.6% to 13.3%. Deming regression analysis of all methods versus the heparin-Mn++ method gave slopes from 0.88 to 1.08 and intercepts from -4.5 to 0.0 mg/dL. All methods met the current 22% total error for individual specimens recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program. Not all methods could measure high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the presence of high concentrations of triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of all methods met the current recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Not all methods met the 1998 performance goals.

摘要

目的

评估预分装试剂(SPINPRO、ISO Spin、Vitros和One Shots)和非离心分离法(Magnetic-HDL)测定高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法与传统高密度脂蛋白胆固醇测定方法(PBI Plus、Boehringer-Mannheim和Abbott)相比的性能。

设计

根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会文件EP5-T2,通过检测两种浓度的冷冻人血清和两种浓度的冻干质控物质来评估精密度。通过将每种方法得到的样本结果与胆固醇参考方法实验室网络指定比较方法以及脂质研究诊所的肝素-Mn++方法得到的结果进行比较来评估准确性。使用高甘油三酯水平供体的血清来检验每种方法检测脂血样本的能力。

地点

门诊诊所和大学医学中心。

患者

42名门诊供体,其高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平为30至102mg/dL,胆固醇水平为107至679mg/dL,甘油三酯水平为20至2450mg/dL。

主要观察指标

精密度、准确性、线性以及检测脂血样本的能力。

结果

不精密度的变异系数(CV)为1.4%至8.6%。每种方法与指定比较方法相比的平均绝对偏差为2.6%至13.3%。所有方法与肝素-Mn++方法的Deming回归分析得出斜率为0.88至1.08,截距为-4.5至0.0mg/dL。所有方法均符合美国国家胆固醇教育计划推荐的当前单个标本22%的总误差要求。并非所有方法都能在高浓度甘油三酯存在的情况下测定高密度脂蛋白胆固醇。

结论

所有方法的性能均符合美国国家胆固醇教育计划的当前建议。并非所有方法都达到了1998年的性能目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验