Lautenbacher S, Rollman G B
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Clin J Pain. 1997 Sep;13(3):189-96. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199709000-00003.
To examine possible deficiencies in endogenous pain modulating mechanisms in fibromyalgia patients compared with matched pain-free control subjects. DESIGN/SUBJECTS/METHODOLOGY: Pain reduction was investigated in 25 female patients with fibromyalgia and 26 age-matched healthy women using the diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) paradigm. Tonic thermal stimuli at painful and nonpainful intensities, tailored to individual heat pain thresholds, were employed to induce pain inhibition. The anticipated effect was assessed by measuring the electrical pain threshold and detection threshold, using a double staircase method. Only nontender control points were stimulated (thermode on the foot, electrodes on the inner forearm).
The patients with fibromyalgia had significantly lower heat pain thresholds than the healthy subjects, but similar electrical detection and pain thresholds. The repeatedly applied electrical stimuli resulted in a degree of perceptual adaptation that was similar between the two groups. However, concurrent tonic thermal stimuli, at both painful and nonpainful levels, significantly increased the electrical pain threshold in the healthy subjects but not in the fibromyalgia patients. The electrical detection threshold was not affected in either group.
Pain modulation, produced by a concurrent tonic stimulus in healthy persons, was not seen in the fibromyalgia group. The patients either had deficient pain modulation or were unable to tolerate a tonic stimulus intense enough to engage a modulatory process. It remains to be established whether the pain reduction found in the healthy subjects was the conventional DNIC effect, another effect (e.g., distraction), or a combination of both.
与相匹配的无疼痛对照受试者相比,研究纤维肌痛患者内源性疼痛调节机制可能存在的缺陷。
设计/受试者/方法:采用弥漫性伤害性抑制控制(DNIC)范式,对25名女性纤维肌痛患者和26名年龄匹配的健康女性进行疼痛减轻情况的研究。采用根据个体热痛阈值定制的疼痛和非疼痛强度的持续性热刺激来诱导疼痛抑制。使用双阶梯法通过测量电痛阈值和检测阈值来评估预期效果。仅刺激非压痛对照点(足部的热电极,前臂内侧的电极)。
纤维肌痛患者的热痛阈值显著低于健康受试者,但电检测阈值和痛阈值相似。重复施加电刺激导致两组的感知适应程度相似。然而,在疼痛和非疼痛水平上同时施加的持续性热刺激,使健康受试者的电痛阈值显著升高,但纤维肌痛患者却没有。两组的电检测阈值均未受影响。
在纤维肌痛组中未观察到健康人因同时施加持续性刺激而产生的疼痛调节。这些患者要么存在疼痛调节缺陷,要么无法耐受足以启动调节过程的强烈持续性刺激。健康受试者中发现的疼痛减轻是传统的DNIC效应、另一种效应(如注意力分散)还是两者的组合,仍有待确定。