Welsh-Bohmer K A, Gearing M, Saunders A M, Roses A D, Mirra S
Department of Psychiatry, and Joseph and Kathleen Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ann Neurol. 1997 Sep;42(3):319-25. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420308.
We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) epsilon4 allele for the neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) in a clinical series of well-characterized AD patients and controls followed longitudinally in the multicenter study of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). In the 162 patients for whom autopsy and ApoE genotype data were available, the clinical diagnosis of AD was verified as the primary cause of dementia in 139 cases (139 of 162, or 86%). The sensitivity and specificity of the epsilon4 allele for AD were both 83%. The positive predictive value of the epsilon4 allele was very high at 97% (115 of 119); whereas, the negative predictive value was 44% (19 of 43), providing no useful information for diagnosis of AD when the epsilon4 allele is not present. Of the cases where AD was not considered the primary or sole cause of dementia (n = 23), 6 cases exhibited concomitant neuropathological findings of definite or probable AD and 2 of these 6 cases had at least one epsilon4 allele. These multicenter data extend previous observations reported from smaller case series of single laboratories and demonstrate that once the clinical diagnosis of AD is established, the presence of an epsilon4 allele reliably predicts the ultimate CERAD neuropathological diagnosis of AD. The findings also suggest that ApoE genotype information is useful clinically in bolstering diagnostic confidence when an epsilon4 allele is present and in identifying a group of patients for whom additional diagnostic evaluations may be warranted when the epsilon4 allele is absent.
在建立阿尔茨海默病注册库联盟(CERAD)的多中心纵向研究中,我们评估了载脂蛋白E(ApoE)ε4等位基因对阿尔茨海默病(AD)神经病理学诊断的敏感性、特异性和预测价值,该研究纳入了一系列特征明确的AD患者和对照。在162例有尸检和ApoE基因型数据的患者中,AD的临床诊断被确认为139例痴呆的主要病因(162例中的139例,即86%)。ε4等位基因对AD的敏感性和特异性均为83%。ε4等位基因的阳性预测值非常高,为97%(119例中的115例);而阴性预测值为44%(43例中的19例),当不存在ε4等位基因时,对AD诊断没有提供有用信息。在AD不被认为是痴呆的主要或唯一病因的病例中(n = 23),6例表现出明确或可能AD的伴随神经病理学发现,这6例中的2例至少有一个ε4等位基因。这些多中心数据扩展了先前单个实验室较小病例系列报告的观察结果,并表明一旦确立AD的临床诊断,ε4等位基因的存在可靠地预测了最终的CERAD AD神经病理学诊断。研究结果还表明,ApoE基因型信息在临床上有用,当存在ε4等位基因时可增强诊断信心,当不存在ε4等位基因时可识别出可能需要进行额外诊断评估的一组患者。