Marcantonio D, Panasci L C, Hollingshead M G, Alley M C, Camalier R F, Sausville E A, Dykes D J, Carter C A, Malspeis L
Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cancer Res. 1997 Sep 15;57(18):3895-8.
Nitrosoureas are among the most widely used agents used in the treatment of malignant gliomas. Here, the activity of 2-chloroethyl-3-sarcosinamide-1-nitrosourea (SarCNU) was compared with that of 1,3-bis-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), in vivo against s.c. implanted SF-295 and U-251 central nervous system (CNS) tumor xenografts. When given i.v., q4d for 3 doses, to athymic mice bearing s.c. SF-295 tumors, SarCNU, at an optimum of 167 mg/kg/dose, produced 9 tumor-free animals of 10 total animals, 1 regression, and no evidence of overt toxicity (> or =20% body weight loss). With a similar dosing schedule, BCNU produced no tumor-free animals, six regressions, and one drug-related death at its optimum of 30 mg/kg/dose. Furthermore, SarCNU retained high antitumor activity at two lower dose levels, 66 and 45% of the optimal dose, whereas BCNU demonstrated a progressive loss of antitumor activity at lower doses. Following p.o. administration, SarCNU similarly demonstrated antitumor activity that was superior to that of BCNU. In the U-251 CNS tumor model, SarCNU yielded six of six tumor-free animals at 80 mg/kg/dose with i.p. administration q.d. for 5 days, starting on day 14, whereas BCNU, at 9 mg/kg/dose, yielded three of six tumor-free mice and one drug-related death. Again, SarCNU resulted in tumor-free animals at 66 and 45% of its optimal dose and was relatively nontoxic, in contrast to BCNU. Results of testing to date indicate that SarCNU is clearly more effective than BCNU against the human CNS tumors SF-295 and U-251 in vivo. These results encourage the initiation of clinical trials for SarCNU, in an effort to improve therapeutic approaches to glioma, but clinical trials must determine whether superiority of SarCNU in preclinical models can be extrapolated to patients.
亚硝基脲类药物是治疗恶性胶质瘤最常用的药物之一。在此,比较了2-氯乙基-3-肌氨酸酰胺-1-亚硝基脲(SarCNU)与1,3-双(2-氯乙基)-1-亚硝基脲(BCNU)在体内对皮下植入的SF-295和U-251中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤异种移植物的活性。当以静脉注射方式,每4天给药3次,给予携带皮下SF-295肿瘤的无胸腺小鼠时,SarCNU在最佳剂量为167mg/kg/剂量时,10只动物中有9只无瘤,1只肿瘤消退,且无明显毒性迹象(体重减轻≥20%)。采用类似的给药方案,BCNU在最佳剂量为30mg/kg/剂量时,未产生无瘤动物,有6只肿瘤消退,1只与药物相关的死亡。此外,SarCNU在两个较低剂量水平(最佳剂量的66%和45%)时仍保持高抗肿瘤活性,而BCNU在较低剂量时抗肿瘤活性逐渐丧失。口服给药后,SarCNU同样显示出优于BCNU的抗肿瘤活性。在U-251 CNS肿瘤模型中,从第14天开始,以腹腔注射方式,每天给药,剂量为80mg/kg,共给药5天,SarCNU使6只动物中的6只无瘤,而BCNU在剂量为9mg/kg时,6只小鼠中有3只无瘤,且有1只与药物相关的死亡。同样,与BCNU相比,SarCNU在其最佳剂量的66%和45%时产生了无瘤动物,且相对无毒。迄今为止的测试结果表明,在体内,SarCNU对人类CNS肿瘤SF-295和U-251的疗效明显优于BCNU。这些结果鼓励开展SarCNU的临床试验,以努力改进胶质瘤的治疗方法,但临床试验必须确定SarCNU在临床前模型中的优势是否可以外推至患者。