Lai K K, Melvin Z S, Menard M J, Kotilainen H R, Baker S
Division of Infectious Disease and Immunology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997 Sep;18(9):628-32. doi: 10.1086/647687.
To evaluate the effectiveness of specific infection control measures on the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) and to identify risk factors for its development.
370-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital with approximately 12,000 to 15,000 admissions per year.
Several infection control measures were implemented in 1991 and 1992, and the attack rates of CDAD were calculated quarterly. Antibiotic use for 1988 through 1993 was analyzed. A case-control study was conducted from January 1992 to December 1992 to identify risk factors for acquisition of CDAD.
From 1989 to 1992, the attack rate of CDAD increased from 0.49% to 2.25%. An increase in antibiotic use preceded the rise in the incidence of CDAD in 1991. Despite implementation of various infection control measures, the attack rate decreased to 1.32% in 1993, but did not return to baseline. Ninety-two cases and 78 controls (patients with diarrhea but with negative toxin assay) were studied. By univariate analysis, history of prior respiratory tract infections (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.2-10.4), the number of antibiotics, and the duration of exposure to second-generation cephalosporins (OR, 3.55; CI95, 1.47-9.41) and to ciprofloxacin (OR, 7.27; CI95, 1.13-166.0) were related significantly to the development of CDAD. By stepwise logistic regression analysis, only exposure to antibiotics and prior respiratory tract infections (P = .0001 and .0203, respectively) were found to be significant.
Antibiotic pressure might have contributed to failure of infection control measures to reduce the incidence of CDAD to baseline.
评估特定感染控制措施对艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)发病率的有效性,并确定其发生的危险因素。
一家拥有370张床位的三级护理教学医院,每年约有12000至15000例住院患者。
1991年和1992年实施了多项感染控制措施,并按季度计算CDAD的发病率。分析了1988年至1993年的抗生素使用情况。1992年1月至1992年12月进行了一项病例对照研究,以确定获得CDAD的危险因素。
1989年至1992年,CDAD的发病率从0.49%上升至2.25%。1991年抗生素使用增加先于CDAD发病率上升。尽管实施了各种感染控制措施,1993年发病率降至1.32%,但未恢复到基线水平。研究了92例病例和78例对照(腹泻但毒素检测阴性的患者)。单因素分析显示,既往呼吸道感染史(优势比[OR],3.6;95%置信区间[CI95],1.2 - 10.4)、抗生素数量以及第二代头孢菌素暴露时间(OR,3.55;CI95,1.47 - 9.41)和环丙沙星暴露时间(OR,7.27;CI95,1.13 - 166.0)与CDAD的发生显著相关。逐步逻辑回归分析显示,仅抗生素暴露和既往呼吸道感染(分别为P = 0.0001和0.0203)具有显著性。
抗生素压力可能导致感染控制措施未能将CDAD发病率降至基线水平。