Rasmussen H N, Rasmussen U F
Department of Biochemistry, August Krogh Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mol Cell Biochem. 1997 Sep;174(1-2):55-60.
Mitochondria prepared in small scale from skeletal muscle were studied with respiration measurements and low temperature spectroscopy. The method of preparation was developed for 25-100 mg tissue with pigeon breast muscle as model organ. The yield was 40%. Data collected during the developmental work were used to evaluate criteria of mitochondrial quality. The cytochrome c conservation, i.e. cytochrome c per mitochondrial quantity in the preparation relative to that in the tissue, is a most useful test parameter. It is bounded between 0-100%. Proportionality between the state 3 rate and the cytochrome c conservation was not rejected by statistical tests. The respiratory control ratio (RCR) was also highly correlated to the cytochrome c conservation. These correlations might be extrapolated to 100% conservation to give hypothetical tissue values. The cause for the correlations is discussed. The P/O ratio showed only weak dependence on the cytochrome c conservation and the state 4 rate showed no dependence. Other, rather insensitive test parameters are also discussed. The pigeon breast muscle mitochondria isolated by the final method showed cytochrome c conservation of 73 +/- 9% (n = 16). They are compared with pig biceps femoris mitochondria prepared by the same method. The two types of mitochondria show many similarities. Some differences may be explained by a different amount of inner mitochondrial membrane relative to mitochondrial protein. The pig tissue contains ten times less mitochondrial protein than the pigeon tissue does.
对从小规模骨骼肌中制备的线粒体进行了呼吸测量和低温光谱研究。制备方法是以鸽胸肌为模型器官,针对25 - 100毫克组织开发的。产率为40%。在开发过程中收集的数据用于评估线粒体质量标准。细胞色素c保留率,即制剂中每个线粒体数量的细胞色素c相对于组织中的细胞色素c,是一个非常有用的测试参数。它的范围在0 - 100%之间。统计检验未否定状态3速率与细胞色素c保留率之间的比例关系。呼吸控制率(RCR)也与细胞色素c保留率高度相关。这些相关性可以外推到100%保留率以给出假设的组织值。讨论了相关性的原因。P/O比仅对细胞色素c保留率有微弱依赖性,状态4速率则无依赖性。还讨论了其他不太敏感的测试参数。通过最终方法分离的鸽胸肌线粒体显示细胞色素c保留率为73±9%(n = 16)。将它们与用相同方法制备的猪股二头肌线粒体进行了比较。这两种类型的线粒体显示出许多相似之处。一些差异可能是由于线粒体内膜相对于线粒体蛋白的量不同所致。猪组织中的线粒体蛋白含量比鸽组织少十倍。