• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[当前既定动物尸体处理形式的替代方案——可容忍、有意为之与令人担忧的?]

[Alternatives to presently established forms of animal body removal-- tolerated, intended and feared?].

作者信息

Kamphues J

机构信息

Institut für Tierernährung, Tierärztlichen Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1997 Jul;104(7):257-60.

PMID:9312475
Abstract

The removal and disposal of dead animals and slaughterhouse offalls by rendering plants to produce meat and bone meal (high nutritive value due to the protein and mineral content) is a model for a successful concept of recycling organic matter. Especially since the discussion on BSE and on the role of meat meal in distribution of this disease the products--inspite of their nutritive value--came under criticism. Besides this development more and more owners of companion animals refuse the removal of their animals by rendering plants, increasing their demand of other kinds of disposal (crematorium, burial-grounds). The image of meat and bone meal has been reduced in the last years, although the animal production causes the mass of mortalities and slaughterhouse offals there is a trend to renounce on the use of meat and bone meal in food producing animals. From the ecological and economical point of view it is irresponsible to use a meat and bone meal--produced under specified conditions concerning temperature, pressure and duration of heat treatment--as fuel. Alternative kinds of disposal of dead animals (for example composting) are presented and discussed with their advantages and drawbacks, especially their risks from spreading infectious organisms and diseases.

摘要

通过提炼厂处理和处置死畜及屠宰场废弃物以生产肉骨粉(因其蛋白质和矿物质含量而具有高营养价值),是有机物循环利用成功理念的一个典范。尤其是自关于疯牛病以及肉粉在该疾病传播中作用的讨论以来,尽管这些产品具有营养价值,但仍受到了批评。除了这种情况外,越来越多的伴侣动物主人拒绝让提炼厂处理他们的动物尸体,转而增加了对其他处置方式(火葬场、墓地)的需求。尽管动物生产导致了大量死亡和屠宰场废弃物,但在过去几年中,肉骨粉的形象有所下降,并且有一种趋势是不再在食用动物中使用肉骨粉。从生态和经济角度来看,将在特定温度、压力和热处理持续时间条件下生产的肉骨粉用作燃料是不负责任的。本文介绍并讨论了死畜的其他处置方式(例如堆肥)及其优缺点,特别是它们传播传染性生物和疾病的风险。

相似文献

1
[Alternatives to presently established forms of animal body removal-- tolerated, intended and feared?].[当前既定动物尸体处理形式的替代方案——可容忍、有意为之与令人担忧的?]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1997 Jul;104(7):257-60.
2
[Animal-derived feeds as possible vectors for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in Germany. 1. Comparative risk assessment for a single animal food of animal origin].
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2001 Jul;108(7):283-90.
3
[Disposal of animal byproducts, dead and slaughtered animals].
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002 Aug;109(8):354-7.
4
Trials of protecting Poland from acquiring bovine spongiform encephalopathy.保护波兰免受牛海绵状脑病侵袭的试验。
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1998;46(2):65-8.
5
[Effect of structural changes in animal husbandry on the environment due to wastes and residues from animal production].[畜牧业结构变化对动物生产废弃物和残留物所造成的环境影响]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1995 Jul;102(7):278-83.
6
[Conventional and alternative types of animal carcass disposal].[动物尸体处理的传统和替代类型]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1997 Jul;104(7):239-45.
7
[The dimension of animal carcass disposal in Germany and Europe-- quantification and differentiation].
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1997 Jul;104(7):232-8.
8
[Alteration of rendering and meat hygiene legislation in the course of the BSE/TSE crisis. Validity of decisive legal provisions (1)].
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1998 Dec;105(12):475-81.
9
[Animal feeding and feed legislation after the detection of the first indigenous BSE cases in Germany].[德国首次发现本土疯牛病病例后的动物饲养与饲料法规]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002 Aug;109(8):362-7.
10
Assessment of the impact of cattle testing strategies on human exposure to BSE agents in Japan.日本牛检测策略对人类接触疯牛病病原体影响的评估。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Apr 1;107(3):256-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.10.006. Epub 2006 Jan 4.