• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Federal block grants and public health: a call for physician partnership and leadership. AMA Council on Scientific Affairs.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;13(5):336-42.

PMID:9315263
Abstract

Current transitions in health care financing and delivery systems have significant implications for public hospitals, community clinics, and health agencies, which provide important outreach and preventive services and rely heavily on federal and state funds. Strong concerns are being raised about the consequences of abrupt and drastic changes in funding of community health institutions and the continuing deterioration of rural and urban public health infrastructures. The viability of public hospitals, clinics, and local health agencies is threatened as government officials consider proposals for defunding, restructuring, or eliminating these entities. In 1996, Congress, the Clinton administration, and state and local government officials considered federal grant proposals and reforms that had potentially far-reaching implications for medical and public health professionals, expressing strong interest in consolidating various specific and narrowly defined categorical grant programs into broader block grant programs. Although no legislation was enacted, deliberations about federal block grant proposals provided important opportunities for physicians and medical societies to support public health activities and guard against further funding reductions that could weaken community health programs and diminish existing levels of quality and access. Ultimately, such deliberations provided a stimulus for medical associations and physicians to strengthen or renew partnerships with public health agencies and officials and provide necessary leadership to ensure that public health and preventive medicine become more integral components of the nation's health system.

摘要

相似文献

1
Federal block grants and public health: a call for physician partnership and leadership. AMA Council on Scientific Affairs.
Am J Prev Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;13(5):336-42.
2
Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.1997财年通过四个联邦-州项目提供的计划生育资金。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jul-Aug;31(4):176-81.
3
Strengthening the public health system.加强公共卫生系统。
Public Health Rep. 1992 Nov-Dec;107(6):609-15.
4
Physician partnership and leadership in public health.医生在公共卫生领域的伙伴关系与领导力。
Am J Prev Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;13(5):334-5.
5
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
6
Touting prevention, Clinton budget seeks increases for family planning.克林顿政府的预算案大力倡导预防措施,寻求增加计划生育方面的资金投入。
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst. 1994 Feb 18(4):1-2.
7
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
8
Grant recipients' rights in question.受资助者的权利存在争议。
Plan Parent Rev. 1984 Spring-Summer;4(1):13-4.
9
Recent changes in selected local health departments: implications for their capacity to guarantee basic medical services.部分地方卫生部门近期的变化:对其保障基本医疗服务能力的影响
Am J Prev Med. 1987 May-Jun;3(3):134-41.
10
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.