Wenzel V, Lehmkuhl P, Kubilis P S, Idris A H, Pichlmayr I
Department of Anesthesiology IV, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Resuscitation. 1997 Oct;35(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(97)00044-0.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills of medical students after a 2-h basic life support class (n = 129) and 6 months later (n = 113). Mean +/- SD written test score decreased from 6.4 +/- 0.7 to 6.2 +/- 0.8 (P = 0.03). Mean +/- SD breaths delivered before CPR decreased from 2.9 +/- 0.6 to 2.2 +/- 1.2 (P = 0.0001), ventilation rate increased from 12.2 +/- 1.9 to 14.3 +/- 5.0 breaths/min (P = 0.0001), tidal volume increased from 0.75 +/- 0.2 to 0.8 +/- 0.31 (P = 0.11), minute ventilation from 9.1 +/- 2.6 to 10.8 +/- 3.61 (P = 0.0001), and stomach inflation from 13 +/- 22 to 18 +/- 27% of CPR breaths (P = 0.11). Mean +/- SD chest compression/min decreased from 56 +/- 9 to 54 +/- 12 (P = 0.34), depth of chest compression increased from 41 +/- 6 to 46 +/- 7 mm (P = 0.0001), hands held incorrectly on the thorax increased from 22 +/- 27 to 23 +/- 32% (P = 0.59), and leaning on the chest from 4 +/- 12 to 18 +/- 28% of compressions (P < 0.0001). In summary, ventilation skills were unpredictable; there was only a 5% chance that a given student would achieve the same mouth-to-mouth ventilation performance in both the BLS class and 6 months later. Despite the respiratory mechanics of the CPR manikin which prevented stomach inflation much better than an unconscious patient with an unprotected airway, stomach inflation occurred repeatedly. Teachers of basic life support classes need to consider the respiratory mechanics of the CPR manikin being used to assure clinically realistic and appropriate mouth-to-mouth ventilation skills.
本研究的目的是评估医学生在参加2小时基础生命支持课程后(n = 129)以及6个月后(n = 113)的心肺复苏(CPR)技能。平均±标准差笔试成绩从6.4±0.7降至6.2±0.8(P = 0.03)。CPR前提供的平均±标准差呼吸次数从2.9±0.6降至2.2±1.2(P = 0.0001),通气率从12.2±1.9次/分钟增加至14.3±5.0次/分钟(P = 0.0001),潮气量从0.75±0.2增加至0.8±0.31(P = 0.11),分钟通气量从9.1±2.6增加至10.8±3.61(P = 0.0001),胃充气占CPR呼吸次数的比例从13±22%增加至18±27%(P = 0.11)。平均±标准差胸外按压次数/分钟从56±9降至54±12(P = 0.34),胸外按压深度从41±6毫米增加至46±7毫米(P = 0.0001),手部在胸部放置错误的比例从22±27%增加至23±32%(P = 0.59),按压时倚靠胸部的比例从4±12%增加至18±28%(P < 0.0001)。总之,通气技能不可预测;在基础生命支持课程中和6个月后,给定学生实现相同口对口通气表现的可能性仅为5%。尽管CPR模拟人在防止胃充气方面的呼吸力学比气道未受保护的昏迷患者要好得多,但胃充气仍反复发生。基础生命支持课程的教师需要考虑所使用CPR模拟人的呼吸力学,以确保具备临床现实且恰当的口对口通气技能。