Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W, Schildermans F, Deberdt W
Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, England.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994 Aug;17(4):320-31. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199408000-00003.
The nootropic agent piracetam has been shown to improve learning and memory, and it may, by this means, facilitate recovery and rehabilitation after a stroke. We report the results of a pilot study exploring its effects in patients undergoing rehabilitation after acute cerebral infarction in the carotid artery territory. We compared piracetam and placebo, each given for 12 weeks, in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of parallel-group design; testing was performed at baseline (6-9 weeks poststroke), weeks 5 and 12, and, in fewer patients, 12 weeks after termination of treatment. Standardized tests of activities of daily living (Barthel Index, Kuriansky Test), aphasia (Aachen Aphasia Test), and perception (Rivermead Perception Assessment Battery) were the primary efficacy variables. Of 158 patients, 137 (81 males, 56 females) were studied after treatment and 88 at 24-week follow-up. Thirty patients on piracetam (45%) and 37 on placebo (53%) were aphasic on entry. Both groups, including the subgroups with aphasia, were well matched at baseline for demographic data, stroke sequelae, type and severity of aphasia, and prognostic parameters. Multivariate analysis of Aachen Aphasia subtest scores showed a significant overall improvement relative to baseline in favor of piracetam (p = 0.02) at 12 weeks. This was not seen at 24 weeks when, however, fewer patients were available for evaluation so that we could neither confirm nor deny whether improvement was maintained after cessation of piracetam. We were unable to demonstrate an effect on tests of activities of daily living and could neither confirm nor exclude an effect on perceptual deficit. We have shown an improvement in aphasia in patients undergoing rehabilitation after a stroke after 12 weeks' treatment with piracetam that requires confirmation in further studies.
促智药吡拉西坦已被证明可改善学习和记忆,并且通过这种方式,它可能有助于中风后的恢复和康复。我们报告了一项探索其对颈动脉区域急性脑梗死康复患者影响的试点研究结果。在一项多中心、双盲、平行组设计的随机试验中,我们比较了吡拉西坦和安慰剂,每组给药12周;在基线(中风后6 - 9周)、第5周和第12周进行测试,在较少患者中,在治疗终止后12周进行测试。日常生活活动能力的标准化测试(巴氏指数、库里安斯基测试)、失语症(亚琛失语症测试)和感知(里弗米德感知评估量表)是主要疗效变量。158名患者中,137名(81名男性,56名女性)在治疗后接受了研究,88名在24周随访时接受了研究。入组时,30名服用吡拉西坦的患者(45%)和37名服用安慰剂的患者(53%)存在失语症。两组,包括失语症亚组,在基线时在人口统计学数据、中风后遗症、失语症类型和严重程度以及预后参数方面匹配良好。对亚琛失语症子测试分数的多变量分析显示,在12周时,相对于基线,吡拉西坦组有显著的总体改善(p = 0.02)。在24周时未观察到这种情况,然而,可供评估的患者较少,因此我们既不能确认也不能否认吡拉西坦停药后改善是否持续。我们未能证明对日常生活活动测试有影响,也不能确认或排除对感知缺陷有影响。我们已经表明,中风后康复患者在接受吡拉西坦治疗12周后失语症有所改善,这需要在进一步研究中得到证实。