Kusenda Z, Kerger J, Awada A, Geurs F, Van Vreckem A, Habboubi N, Piccart M J
EORTC-IDBBC and Chemotherapy Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Support Care Cancer. 1997 Sep;5(5):414-6. doi: 10.1007/s005200050101.
Mitomycin C (MMC)-vinblastine (VBL) is a regimen that has commonly been used as salvage therapy for advanced breast cancer for many years. The hematologic toxicity of this combination is one aspect that limits its usefulness. Amifostine, an organic thiophosphate, has been developed as a selective chemoprotective agent. In this pilot study, we tested the feasibility of MMC/VBL administration in combination with amifostine and we monitored the hematologic toxicity closely. Patients having failed one or two chemotherapy regimens for advanced breast cancer, with a good performance status scored at 2 or better and measurable or evaluable lesion(s), were eligible. They were treated according to the following schedule: mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, vinblastine 5 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and 15, amifostine 910 mg/m2 in short i.v. infusion prior to MMC. Premedication consisted of dexamethasone 3 x 20 mg, haloperidol 2 x 0.5 mg p.o., hydration with 11 of normal saline, metoclopramide 1.5 mg/kg in short infusion and procyclide HCl 10 mg i.v. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. In all, 14 cycles were administrated to six heavily pretreated patients. Following the first cycle, five of the six patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia on day 15, and consequently did not receive the second vinblastine administration as planned. Three out of four patients receiving two or more cycles had moderate thrombocytopenia. There were no patients with neutropenic fever or major bleeding problems. The MMC/VBL+amifostine regimen was well tolerated regarding other toxicities. Neither amifostine-related acute vomiting nor any significant decrease in blood pressure was observed. Administration of amifostine in combination with MMC/VBL was feasible but in this group of heavily pretreated patients there were no hints of a protective effect of amifostine on the hematologic toxicity profile of this chemotherapy regimen.
丝裂霉素C(MMC)-长春碱(VBL)方案多年来一直常用作晚期乳腺癌的挽救治疗。这种联合用药的血液学毒性是限制其应用的一个方面。氨磷汀,一种有机硫代磷酸盐,已被开发为一种选择性化学保护剂。在这项初步研究中,我们测试了MMC/VBL与氨磷汀联合给药的可行性,并密切监测血液学毒性。晚期乳腺癌患者在接受一或两个化疗方案治疗失败,体能状态评分为2分或更高且有可测量或可评估病灶,符合入组条件。他们按照以下方案接受治疗:丝裂霉素C 10mg/m²静脉注射,第1天;长春碱5mg/m²静脉注射,第1天和第15天;氨磷汀910mg/m²在MMC之前进行短时间静脉输注。预处理包括地塞米松3×20mg、氟哌啶醇2×0.5mg口服、1升生理盐水水化、甲氧氯普胺1.5mg/kg短时间输注和盐酸丙环定10mg静脉注射。每4周重复一个周期。总共对6例经过大量预处理的患者进行了14个周期的治疗。在第一个周期后,6例患者中有5例在第15天出现3级或4级中性粒细胞减少,因此未按计划接受第二次长春碱给药。接受两个或更多周期治疗的4例患者中有3例出现中度血小板减少。没有患者发生中性粒细胞减少性发热或严重出血问题。MMC/VBL+氨磷汀方案在其他毒性方面耐受性良好。未观察到与氨磷汀相关的急性呕吐或血压有任何显著下降。氨磷汀与MMC/VBL联合给药是可行的,但在这组经过大量预处理的患者中,没有迹象表明氨磷汀对该化疗方案的血液学毒性有保护作用。