Yonekawa Y, Ogata N, Imhof H G, Olivecrona M, Strommer K, Kwak T E, Roth P, Groscurth P
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
J Neurosurg. 1997 Oct;87(4):636-42. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.4.0636.
Removal of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) facilitates radical removal of tumors or radical neck clipping of aneurysms in the supra- and parasellar regions by providing a wide operative exposure of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the optic nerve and by reducing the need for brain retraction. Over a period of 3 years, anterior clinoidectomy was performed in 40 patients, 30 of whom harbored aneurysms (18 of the ICA and 13 of the basilar artery [one patient had two aneurysms]) and 10 of whom had tumors (four large pituitary tumors, four craniopharyngiomas, and two sphenoid ridge meningiomas). The ACP was removed extradurally in 31 cases and intradurally in nine cases. Extradural clinoidectomy was performed in all cases of pituitary adenoma and craniopharyngioma and in most cases of basilar artery aneurysm. Intradural clinoidectomy was performed in two cases of ICA-ophthalmic artery aneurysm, two cases of ICA-posterior communicating artery aneurysm, two cases of ICA cavernous aneurysm, one case of basilar artery aneurysm, and two cases of sphenoid ridge meningioma. The outcome was satisfactory in all patients, except for one patient who underwent clipping of a basilar tip aneurysm and suffered a thalamic and midbrain infarction. Three patients who underwent extradural clinoidectomy suffered a postoperative diminution of visual acuity or a visual field defect on the side of the clinoidectomy. These deficits may have been caused either by drilling of the ACP or by other operative manipulation of the optic nerve. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, which required reoperation, occurred in one patient. The authors' experience suggests that the extradural technique of ACP removal is easier and less time consuming than the intradural one and provides better operative exposure. It can be used routinely in treating lesions in the supra- and parasellar regions.
切除前床突(ACP)可通过提供颈内动脉(ICA)和视神经广泛的手术视野以及减少脑牵拉的需求,便于彻底切除鞍上和鞍旁区域的肿瘤或对动脉瘤进行根治性夹闭。在3年的时间里,对40例患者实施了前床突切除术,其中30例患有动脉瘤(18例为ICA动脉瘤,13例为基底动脉动脉瘤[1例患者有2个动脉瘤]),10例患有肿瘤(4例大型垂体瘤、4例颅咽管瘤和2例蝶骨嵴脑膜瘤)。31例患者经硬膜外切除前床突,9例经硬膜内切除。垂体腺瘤和颅咽管瘤的所有病例以及大多数基底动脉动脉瘤病例均采用硬膜外前床突切除术。2例ICA - 眼动脉动脉瘤、2例ICA - 后交通动脉动脉瘤、2例ICA海绵窦段动脉瘤、1例基底动脉动脉瘤和2例蝶骨嵴脑膜瘤病例采用硬膜内前床突切除术。除1例接受基底动脉尖动脉瘤夹闭术的患者发生丘脑和中脑梗死外,所有患者的预后均令人满意。3例接受硬膜外前床突切除术的患者术后出现前床突切除术侧视力下降或视野缺损。这些缺陷可能是由于前床突钻孔或对视神经的其他手术操作所致。1例患者发生脑脊液鼻漏,需要再次手术。作者的经验表明,硬膜外切除前床突的技术比硬膜内技术更容易、耗时更少,且能提供更好的手术视野。它可常规用于治疗鞍上和鞍旁区域的病变。