• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术出版物稿件的修订。

Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.

作者信息

Dowd S B, McElveny C

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

出版信息

Radiol Technol. 1997 Sep-Oct;69(1):47-54.

PMID:9323765
Abstract

Research shows that only 5% to 10% of manuscripts submitted to scholarly journals are accepted upon submission; the remainder must be revised before they are suitable for publication. Research also shows that authors who perform requested revisions greatly improve their chances of being published. In fact, a properly revised manuscript is almost guaranteed eventual publication at many journals. Despite these encouraging statistics, a significant number of authors choose to withdraw their manuscripts rather than perform revisions. This article examines the peer-review process, looks at common reasons why revisions are requested by reviewers and presents advice to authors on how to revise and resubmit their manuscripts for publication.

摘要

研究表明,提交给学术期刊的稿件只有5%到10%在提交时就被接受;其余的必须经过修改才适合发表。研究还表明,进行要求修改的作者大大提高了发表的机会。事实上,一份经过恰当修改的稿件在许多期刊上几乎肯定最终会发表。尽管有这些令人鼓舞的数据,但仍有相当数量的作者选择撤回稿件而不是进行修改。本文审视同行评审过程,探讨审稿人要求修改的常见原因,并就作者如何修改和重新提交稿件以供发表提供建议。

相似文献

1
Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.学术出版物稿件的修订。
Radiol Technol. 1997 Sep-Oct;69(1):47-54.
2
The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication.稿件未被接受发表的十大原因。
Respir Care. 2004 Oct;49(10):1246-52.
3
Dealing with returned manuscripts.处理退稿。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Nov;50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053.
4
Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.用于在同行评审的牙科期刊上发表的稿件的科学撰写与审核。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):201-18. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.54.
5
What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.在《印度儿科学》上提交的内容与被接受的内容:投稿分析、评审过程、决策制定及退稿标准
Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jun;43(6):479-89.
6
Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.作为论文发表写作的一部分,回应审稿人的意见。
Nurse Res. 2011;18(4):23-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.23.c8632.
7
Caveats in the proficient preparation of an APA-style research manuscript for publication.为发表而熟练准备一篇 APA 格式研究手稿时的注意事项。
Body Image. 2009 Jan;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
8
The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.2002年至2003年间提交给《美国眼科杂志》的稿件的结果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):551-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.004. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
9
Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.早期编辑手稿筛选与强制同行评审:一项随机试验。
Ann Neurol. 2007 Apr;61(4):A10-2. doi: 10.1002/ana.21150.
10
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.稿件评审人在同行评审过程中的作用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Sep;165(3):685-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.3.7645496.