Suppr超能文献

高血容量对血液透析患者透析间期血流动力学及血压控制的影响。

Effects of hypervolemia on interdialytic hemodynamics and blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Luik A J, van Kuijk W H, Spek J, de Heer F, van Bortel L M, Schiffers P M, van Hooff J P, Leunissen K M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, St Maartens Gasthuis, Venlo, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Oct;30(4):466-74. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90303-6.

Abstract

The influence of hypervolemia on hemodynamics and interdialytic blood pressure, as well as in relation to vascular compliance, was investigated in 10 hemodialysis patients who were not receiving vasoactive medication. All subjects were studied during a relative normovolemic interdialytic period (from 1 kg below dry weight postdialytic until dry weight predialytic) and a hypervolemic interdialytic period (from 1 kg above dry weight postdialytic until 3 kg above dry weight predialytic). Interdialytic blood pressure was measured with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Cardiac output was echographically measured and total peripheral resistance calculated postdialytic, mid-interdialytic, and predialytic. At the same time, a blood sample was drawn for analyzing vasoactive hormones, sodium, and hematocrit. In all patients, ideal dry weight was estimated by echography of the caval vein. Arterial and venous compliance were measured with an ultrasound vessel wall movement detector system and a strain-gauge plethysmograph. After fluid load, an increase in intravascular volume, an increase in caval vein diameter and cardiac output, and a decrease in peripheral resistance was observed. No significant influence of a 3-L fluid load was found on interdialytic blood pressure course (153+/-24 mm Hg/90+/-19 mm Hg in the hypervolemic period and 146+/-27 mm Hg/89+/-22 mm Hg in the normovolemic period). Sodium and osmolality were similar in the hypervolemic and normovolemic interdialytic periods. After fluid load, a decrease in arginine vasopressin and angiotensin II was observed, which probably contributed to the decreased systemic vascular resistance. Catecholamines were not influenced by fluid load, but increased during the interdialytic period, suggesting accumulation after dialysis. Three of the 10 patients had higher systolic but not diastolic blood pressures after fluid load (159+/-13 mm Hg/81+/-22 mm Hg in the hypervolemic period and 135+/-16 mm Hg/81+/-22 mm Hg in the normovolemic period). No correlation could be found between arterial or venous compliance and blood pressure changes. We concluded that a 3-L interdialytic fluid load does not result in higher blood pressure in most hemodialysis patients.

摘要

在10名未接受血管活性药物治疗的血液透析患者中,研究了高血容量对血流动力学、透析间期血压以及与血管顺应性的影响。所有受试者均在相对正常血容量的透析间期(从透析后低于干体重1kg至透析前干体重)和高血容量的透析间期(从透析后高于干体重1kg至透析前高于干体重3kg)进行研究。透析间期血压用动态血压监测仪测量。透析后、透析中期和透析前通过超声心动图测量心输出量并计算总外周阻力。同时,采集血样分析血管活性激素、钠和血细胞比容。在所有患者中,通过腔静脉超声心动图估算理想干体重。用超声血管壁运动检测系统和应变片体积描记器测量动脉和静脉顺应性。液体负荷后,观察到血管内容量增加、腔静脉直径和心输出量增加以及外周阻力降低。未发现3L液体负荷对透析间期血压变化有显著影响(高血容量期为153±24mmHg/90±19mmHg,正常血容量期为146±27mmHg/89±22mmHg)。高血容量和正常血容量的透析间期钠和渗透压相似。液体负荷后,观察到精氨酸加压素和血管紧张素II减少,这可能导致全身血管阻力降低。儿茶酚胺不受液体负荷影响,但在透析间期增加,提示透析后蓄积。10名患者中有3名在液体负荷后收缩压升高但舒张压未升高(高血容量期为159±13mmHg/81±22mmHg,正常血容量期为135±16mmHg/81±22mmHg)。未发现动脉或静脉顺应性与血压变化之间存在相关性。我们得出结论,对于大多数血液透析患者,3L透析间期液体负荷不会导致血压升高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验