Timmerman W, Westerink B H
University Center for Pharmacy, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Synapse. 1997 Nov;27(3):242-61. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199711)27:3<242::AID-SYN9>3.0.CO;2-D.
Microdialysis has become a frequently used method to study extracellular levels of GABA and glutamate in the central nervous system. However, the fact that the major part of GABA and glutamate as measured by microdialysis does not fulfill the classical criteria for exocytotic release questions the vesicular origin of the amino acids in dialysates. Glial metabolism or reversal of the (re)uptake sites has been suggested to be responsible for the pool of nonexocytotically released amino-acid transmitters that seem to predominate over the neuronal exocytotic pool. The origin of extracellular GABA and glutamate levels and, as a consequence, the implications of changes in these levels upon manipulations are therefore obscure. This review critically analyzes what microdialysis data signify, i.e., whether amino-acid neurotransmitters sampled by microdialysis represent synaptic release, carrier-mediated release, or glial metabolism. The basal levels of GABA and glutamate are virtually tetrodotoxin- and calcium-independent. Given the fact that evidence for nonexocytotic release mediated by reversal of the uptake sites as a release mechanism relevant for normal neurotransmission is so far limited to conditions of "excessive stimulation," basal levels most likely reflect a nonneuronal pool of amino acids. Extracellular GABA and glutamate concentrations can be enhanced by a wide variety of pharmacological and physiological manipulations. However, it is presently impossible to ascertain that the stimulated GABA and glutamate in dialysates are of neuronal origin. On the other hand, under certain stimulatory conditions, increases in amino-acid transmitters can be obtained in the presence of tetrodotoxin, again suggesting that aspecific factors not directly related to neurotransmission underlie these changes in extracellular levels. It is concluded that synaptic transmission of GABA and glutamate is strictly compartmentalized and as a result, these amino acids can hardly leak out of the synaptic cleft and reach the extracellular space where the dialysis probe samples.
微透析已成为研究中枢神经系统中γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)和谷氨酸细胞外水平的常用方法。然而,通过微透析测量的GABA和谷氨酸的大部分并不符合胞吐释放的经典标准,这对透析液中氨基酸的囊泡起源提出了质疑。有人认为,胶质细胞代谢或(再)摄取位点的逆转是导致非胞吐释放的氨基酸递质池的原因,这个池似乎比神经元胞吐池占主导地位。因此,细胞外GABA和谷氨酸水平的起源以及这些水平变化对操作的影响尚不清楚。本综述批判性地分析了微透析数据的意义,即微透析采样的氨基酸神经递质是否代表突触释放、载体介导的释放或胶质细胞代谢。GABA和谷氨酸的基础水平实际上与河豚毒素和钙无关。鉴于目前为止,作为与正常神经传递相关的释放机制,由摄取位点逆转介导的非胞吐释放的证据仅限于“过度刺激”条件,基础水平很可能反映了氨基酸的非神经元池。细胞外GABA和谷氨酸浓度可通过多种药理和生理操作来提高。然而,目前无法确定透析液中受刺激的GABA和谷氨酸是否来源于神经元。另一方面,在某些刺激条件下,在存在河豚毒素的情况下可以获得氨基酸递质的增加,这再次表明与神经传递不直接相关的非特异性因素是这些细胞外水平变化的基础。得出的结论是,GABA和谷氨酸的突触传递是严格分隔的,因此,这些氨基酸很难从突触间隙泄漏出来并到达透析探针采样的细胞外空间。