• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[冠状动脉支架植入术——现状]

[Stent implantation in coronary arteries--current status].

作者信息

Frombach R, Schwartau M, Seger W

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 1997 Jul;59(7):447-51.

PMID:9333385
Abstract

Intracoronary stents have improved the safety and efficacy of transcatheter cardiovascular therapy. They can reverse acute vessel or graft closure during coronary intervention. Certain devices reduce the rate of restenosis and need for repeat interventional procedures compared with PTCA alone in selected patients. However caution is strongly recommended in generalising these findings to other situations than for which coronary stenting is considered. The rapid proliferation and application of this technique to very large groups of patients without supporting data should be reconsidered. Intermediate and longterm follow up date are not yet available.

摘要

冠状动脉内支架改善了经导管心血管治疗的安全性和有效性。它们可以在冠状动脉介入治疗期间逆转急性血管或移植物闭塞。与单纯PTCA相比,某些装置在特定患者中可降低再狭窄率和重复介入治疗的必要性。然而,强烈建议谨慎地将这些发现推广到冠状动脉支架置入术适用情况以外的其他情况。在没有支持数据的情况下,将这项技术迅速推广并应用于大量患者的做法应重新考虑。目前尚无中期和长期随访数据。

相似文献

1
[Stent implantation in coronary arteries--current status].[冠状动脉支架植入术——现状]
Gesundheitswesen. 1997 Jul;59(7):447-51.
2
Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty.冠状动脉支架对死亡率和非致死性心肌梗死的影响:比较常规支架置入策略与球囊血管成形术策略的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2004 May;147(5):815-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.025.
3
[Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for restenosis following Palmaz-Schatz stenting: larger size balloons are more effective?].
J Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):55-60.
4
Randomized comparison of J&J Crown stent versus NIR stent after routine coronary angioplasty.常规冠状动脉血管成形术后强生Crown支架与NIR支架的随机对照比较。
Am Heart J. 2001 Nov;142(5):E8. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.118744.
5
Comparison of long-term (seven year) outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization with versus without stenting.接受经皮冠状动脉血运重建术并置入支架与未置入支架患者的长期(七年)结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;97(10):1467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.036. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
6
Indications for intracoronary stent placement: the european view. Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology.冠状动脉内支架置入术的适应证:欧洲观点。欧洲心脏病学会冠状动脉循环工作组。
Eur Heart J. 1999 Jul;20(14):1014-9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1998.1395.
7
Treatment of true bifurcation stenosis by elective stent implantation in parent vessel and non-stent dilatation of side branch: immediate and follow-up results.通过对主干血管进行选择性支架植入和对分支进行非支架扩张治疗真性分叉狭窄:即刻及随访结果
Indian Heart J. 2000 May-Jun;52(3):289-96.
8
[Is Palmaz-Schatz stenting effective for second restenosis?].
J Cardiol. 1999 Nov;34(5):243-8.
9
[Clinical outcome in patients after single vessel PTCA with multiple stent implantation].[单支血管经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)并多支架植入术后患者的临床结局]
Przegl Lek. 2001;58(6):479-83.
10
Safety and feasibility of coronary stenting during rescue PTCA: in-hospital outcome.
G Ital Cardiol. 1999 Jun;29(6):630-6.