• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹膜炎的阶段性抗生素治疗。前瞻性研究]

[Stage-oriented antibiotic therapy of peritonitis. Prospective study].

作者信息

Winkeltau G J, Töns C, Bertram P, Schumpelick V

机构信息

Chirurgische Universitätsklinik der RWTH, Aachen.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(4 Suppl 1):S22-5. doi: 10.1007/pl00014639.

DOI:10.1007/pl00014639
PMID:9333703
Abstract

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective protocol 25 consecutive patients with diffuse peritonitis were treated in the Surgical Clinic of the RWT-University in Aachen, Germany, from January to December 1995. According to the "Mannheim Peritonitis Score" three different stages were treated with different surgical procedures and a selective antibiotic regimen. Group-A patients with prognostically favorable peritonitis (MPS 0-20) were treated with the so-called standard procedure, group-B patients (MPS: 21-29) with closed postoperative lavage. The antibiotic regimen was cefotaxime (2 x 2 g) and metronidazole (2 x 500 mg) for both group-A and group-B patients. Severe group-C cases (MPS > 29) were treated with the so-called Etappenlavage (multiple reexplorations and intra-operative lavage) and received a combination of three antibiotics (2 x 2 g cefotaxime; 2 x 500 mg metronidazole and 2 x 200 mg ofloxacin).

RESULTS

Eight patients belonged to group A, 10 to group B, and 7 to group C. The mortality was 0% (group A), 20% (group B), and 29% (group C), respectively. The actual overall mortality of the whole group was 16% (4/25). The statistically expected mortality was 36%, according to the APACHE-II-Score (P = 0.0982).

摘要

患者与方法

1995年1月至12月,在德国亚琛RWTH大学外科诊所,按照前瞻性方案对25例连续性弥漫性腹膜炎患者进行了治疗。根据“曼海姆腹膜炎评分”,三个不同阶段采用了不同的外科手术方法和选择性抗生素治疗方案。A组为预后良好的腹膜炎患者(曼海姆腹膜炎评分0 - 20分),采用所谓的标准手术方法治疗;B组患者(曼海姆腹膜炎评分:21 - 29分)采用术后闭式灌洗治疗。A组和B组患者的抗生素治疗方案均为头孢噻肟(2×2g)和甲硝唑(2×500mg)。C组严重病例(曼海姆腹膜炎评分>29分)采用所谓的分期灌洗(多次再次探查和术中灌洗)治疗,并接受三种抗生素联合治疗(2×2g头孢噻肟;2×500mg甲硝唑和2×200mg氧氟沙星)。

结果

A组有8例患者,B组有10例患者,C组有7例患者。死亡率分别为0%(A组)、20%(B组)和29%(C组)。整个组的实际总死亡率为16%(4/25)。根据急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE-II)评分,统计学预期死亡率为36%(P = 0.0982)。

相似文献

1
[Stage-oriented antibiotic therapy of peritonitis. Prospective study].[腹膜炎的阶段性抗生素治疗。前瞻性研究]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(4 Suppl 1):S22-5. doi: 10.1007/pl00014639.
2
[Differentiated surgical therapy of diffuse peritonitis--a prospective study].[弥漫性腹膜炎的差异化外科治疗——一项前瞻性研究]
Leber Magen Darm. 1996 May;26(3):144-8.
3
Cefotaxime and metronidazole in severe intra-abdominal infection.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):183-8. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00104-i.
4
Randomized, comparative study of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.口服氧氟沙星与静脉注射头孢噻肟治疗自发性细菌性腹膜炎的随机对照研究。
Gastroenterology. 1996 Oct;111(4):1011-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(96)70069-0.
5
Efficacy of metronidazole lavage in treatment of intraperitoneal sepsis. A prospective study.
Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Jul;41(7):1313-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02088553.
6
[Adjuvant therapy of peritonitis with taurolidine. Modulation of mediator liberation].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(4 Suppl 1):S26-30. doi: 10.1007/pl00014640.
7
Comparison of cefotaxime and ofloxacin in treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.头孢噻肟与氧氟沙星治疗自发性细菌性腹膜炎的比较。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar;15(1):34-8.
8
[Surgical management of severe peritonitis].[重症腹膜炎的外科治疗]
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Jul;127(7):594-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32839.
9
Cefotaxime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.头孢噻肟治疗自发性细菌性腹膜炎。
Hepatology. 1996 Apr;23(4):941-2. doi: 10.1053/jhep.1996.v23.ajhep0230941.
10
[Surgical therapy of peritonitis].[腹膜炎的外科治疗]
Chirurg. 2011 Mar;82(3):242-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-2015-2.