Suppr超能文献

[阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗中降低呼气压力:治疗起始阶段治疗接受度的前瞻性随机研究]

[Nasal CPAP therapy of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with expiratory pressure reduction: a prospective randomized study of acceptance of treatment during therapy initiation].

作者信息

Ficker J H, Müller D, Wiest G, Lehnert G, Dertinger S H, Katalinic A, Hahn E G

机构信息

Abteilung Pneumologie, Medizinischen Klinik I mit Poliklinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nümberg.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1997 Jun;51(6):586-91.

PMID:9333792
Abstract

It is often difficult to achieve adequate acceptance of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy by patients with OSA. Many patients find it particularly inconvenient to expire against the treatment pressure. With this in mind, we have attempted to improve acceptance of CPAP therapy by using a bilevel system that reduces the treatment pressure during expiration. 52 patients were randomized either to initial treatment with CPAP therapy followed by bilevel treatment, or to treatment in reversed order. During bilevel therapy the ratio of inspiratory to expiratory pressure was fixed at 1:0.6. After each treatment the patients were interviewed on the basis of visual analogue scales to establish their subjective evaluation of such parameters as general well-being, quality of sleep, comparison of the respective treatment pressures, and possible preference for one of the two systems for long-term treatment. The minimal effective inspiratory treatment pressure during bilevel therapy (IPAP) and the minimal effective CPAP pressure were closely correlated (r = 0.89). There was no difference between the apnoea hypopnoea indices during CPAP therapy as compared with bilevel therapy. Most patients (57%) felt the treatment pressure with the bilevel system to be lower (p = 0.048). There were no differences in patients' well-being early in the morning, or in their assessment of sleep quality. The majority of patients (52%) preferred bilevel therapy for long term treatment, while 38% preferred CPAP therapy (n.s.). In a subgroup of 13 patients with a treatment pressure of > or = 10 mbar during CPAP therapy 10 patients (77%) gave preference to the bilevel system (n.s.). In a considerable number of patients the acceptance of treatment can be improved by using a bilevel system for initiation of nasal positive pressure therapy.

摘要

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者往往难以充分接受鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗。许多患者发现呼气时对抗治疗压力特别不方便。考虑到这一点,我们试图通过使用一种双水平系统来提高CPAP治疗的接受度,该系统在呼气时降低治疗压力。52例患者被随机分为两组,一组先接受CPAP治疗,然后接受双水平治疗,另一组则按相反顺序治疗。在双水平治疗期间,吸气与呼气压力之比固定为1:0.6。每次治疗后,根据视觉模拟量表对患者进行访谈,以确定他们对总体健康状况、睡眠质量、各自治疗压力的比较以及长期治疗中对两种系统之一的可能偏好等参数的主观评价。双水平治疗期间的最小有效吸气治疗压力(IPAP)与最小有效CPAP压力密切相关(r = 0.89)。与双水平治疗相比,CPAP治疗期间的呼吸暂停低通气指数没有差异。大多数患者(57%)感觉双水平系统的治疗压力更低(p = 0.048)。清晨患者的健康状况或他们对睡眠质量的评估没有差异。大多数患者(52%)长期治疗更喜欢双水平治疗,而38%更喜欢CPAP治疗(无统计学差异)。在CPAP治疗期间治疗压力≥10 mbar的13例患者亚组中,10例患者(77%)更喜欢双水平系统(无统计学差异)。通过使用双水平系统启动鼻正压通气治疗,相当一部分患者对治疗的接受度可以得到提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验