Suppr超能文献

[各种持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和双水平气道正压通气(BiLevel CPAP)设备的技术差异]

[Technical differences in various CPAP and BiLevel CPAP devices].

作者信息

Netzer N, Kirbas G, Matthys H, Werner P

机构信息

Medizinische Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Abteilung Pneumologie, Freiburg.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1997 Aug;51 Suppl 3:789-95.

PMID:9340643
Abstract

PURPOSE

Since the first presentations of CPAP by Sullivan 1983 und BiPAP by Sanders 1990 as a successful treatment in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, many CPAP and BiLevel-CPAP devices have been developed by several companies around the world. Although all devices work on the same principle of continuous positive airway pressure delivered through nasal or facemasks, there are, however, significant technical differences between these devices, mainly due to different size and different maximum speed of the turbines. As far as we know, the only study concerning this technical difference in the devices was conducted by Raschke in 1995, who found significant differences in the pressure stability of the devices using a very complicated measurement model on volunteers who were breathing on the different devices. We intended to study the technical differences of the devices using a more simple technique in static conditions, but with very exact measurement.

METHODS

We measured pressure stability on different inspiration flows and different pressure levels of 8 CPAP's and 4 BiLevel-CPAP's under static conditions using the "Höntzsch Exact ASD-G Messrohr ms 20201-18" flow-measurement device and the "Thommen HM 18.0020.A" pressure-measurement devixe. We measured the noise emission by these devices at different frequency levels using the "Brüel and Kjer Dual Channel Real Time Frequency Analyzer", and measured the speed to reach the adjusted pressure level with the "Multimeter Phillips PM 2518X" and "Oszillograph Phillips PM3350" using the voltage change due to different working of the electric engines at different turbine speeds. We also investigated the different construction of the devices by opening them and analysing the materials used in the devices.

RESULTS

The real pressure levels at an adjusted pressure of 10 mbar and at an inspiration flow of 1 Liter/sec range from 8.7 mbar to 15.6 mbar in CPAP's and from 9 mbar to 9.7 mbar in BiLevel devices. At higher inspiration flows the differences are larger, at lower flows smaller. The maximum noise emission in the 10 Hhz spectrum at a distance of 100 cm from the device at an adjusted pressure level of 10 mbar ranged from 29.6 dB to 39.9 dB in CPAP's and 30.4 dB to 42.2 dB in BiLevel-CPAP's. The time to reach an adjusted pressure level of 10 mbar after closing the airway of the device ranged from 0.26 to 0.66 sec in CPAP's and from 0.46 to 0.80 sec in BiLevel devices.

CONCLUSION

There are significant technical differences in the different CPAP and BiLevel devices due to different construction of the turbines and electrical engines of these devices. This should be considered when prescribing a device for a sleep apnoea patient. Not every device is suitable for every patient, and quality differences should be considered by all persons involved in the production and prescribing process.

摘要

目的

自1983年沙利文首次提出持续气道正压通气(CPAP)以及1990年桑德斯提出双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的成功治疗方法以来,全球多家公司已研发出许多CPAP和双水平CPAP设备。尽管所有设备都基于通过鼻罩或面罩输送持续气道正压通气的相同原理工作,但这些设备之间仍存在显著的技术差异,主要是由于涡轮机的尺寸和最大速度不同。据我们所知,唯一一项关于设备技术差异的研究是拉施克在1995年进行的,他使用非常复杂的测量模型,在使用不同设备呼吸的志愿者身上,发现了设备压力稳定性的显著差异。我们打算在静态条件下使用更简单的技术,但进行非常精确的测量,来研究设备的技术差异。

方法

我们使用“Höntzsch Exact ASD - G Messrohr ms 20201 - 18”流量测量设备和“Thommen HM 18.0020.A”压力测量设备,在静态条件下测量了8台CPAP和4台双水平CPAP在不同吸气流量和不同压力水平下的压力稳定性。我们使用“Brüel and Kjer双通道实时频率分析仪”在不同频率水平下测量了这些设备的噪声排放,并使用“福禄克万用表PM 2518X”和“菲利普斯示波器PM3350”,利用不同涡轮速度下电动发动机不同工作状态引起的电压变化,测量了达到调整后压力水平的速度。我们还通过打开设备并分析其使用的材料,研究了设备的不同构造。

结果

在调整压力为10毫巴、吸气流量为1升/秒时,CPAP的实际压力水平在8.7毫巴至15.6毫巴之间,双水平设备在9毫巴至9.7毫巴之间。在较高吸气流量时差异较大,在较低流量时差异较小。在距离设备100厘米处、调整压力水平为10毫巴时,10赫兹频谱中的最大噪声排放,CPAP在29.6分贝至39.9分贝之间,双水平CPAP在30.4分贝至42.2分贝之间。在关闭设备气道后达到调整压力水平10毫巴的时间,CPAP在0.26秒至0.66秒之间,双水平设备在0.46秒至0.80秒之间。

结论

由于这些设备的涡轮机和电动发动机构造不同,不同的CPAP和双水平设备存在显著的技术差异。在为睡眠呼吸暂停患者开处方时应考虑这一点。并非每种设备都适合每位患者,参与生产和开处方过程的所有人员都应考虑质量差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验