• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[瑞士慢性心力衰竭治疗中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的成本效益:基于SOLVD研究的评估]

[Cost effectiveness of ACE inhibition in therapy of chronic heart failure in Switzerland: evaluation based on the SOLVD study].

作者信息

Szucs T D, Goedde M, Berger K, Kiowski W

机构信息

Forschungsgruppe Medizinische Okonomie, München.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997 Jul 22;127(29-30):1234-41.

PMID:9333933
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Morbidity and mortality data in Switzerland underline the socioeconomic importance of heart failure. In the SOLVD study (Study on Left Ventricular Dysfunction), cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were reduced with the ACE inhibitor enalapril in patients with heart failure. The economic implications of this treatment were analyzed in a retrospective economic analysis from the perspective of Swiss third party payers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Source of the economic analysis was the SOLVD study data. This prospective study was placebo-controlled, double-blind and had a mean follow-up of 3.45 years (41.4 months), involving 2569 patients with heart failure, mainly in NYHA classes II and III. Costing data for treatment with enalapril, the per diem charges for hospitalization and the average length of hospital stay were retrieved from published national sources. The costs of in- and output were calculated and compared for the two treatment groups in a cost-efficacy analysis.

RESULTS

Additional treatment with enalapril resulted in an additional cost of 2.5 million Swiss francs. These incremental costs were, however, offset by reduced hospital costs (CHF 6.45 million savings) in the enalapril group. For the complete treatment cohort of the SOLVD study, the net savings were approximately 4.26 million Swiss francs.

CONCLUSIONS

From the clinical point of view, treatment with ACE inhibitors leads to a reduction in the progression of heart failure and reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. With respect to health economics, it can be demonstrated that treatment with enalapril does not only offer clinical benefits, but that these also translate into impressive economic savings of CHF 3315 per patient.

摘要

背景与目的

瑞士的发病率和死亡率数据突显了心力衰竭在社会经济方面的重要性。在SOLVD研究(左心室功能障碍研究)中,心力衰竭患者使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂依那普利可降低心血管发病率和死亡率。从瑞士第三方支付方的角度,通过一项回顾性经济分析对该治疗的经济影响进行了评估。

患者与方法

经济分析的数据来源是SOLVD研究数据。这项前瞻性研究采用安慰剂对照、双盲设计,平均随访时间为3.45年(41.4个月),纳入了2569例心力衰竭患者,主要为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能II级和III级患者。依那普利治疗的成本数据、每日住院费用以及平均住院天数均取自已发表的国内资料。在成本-效益分析中,计算并比较了两个治疗组的投入和产出成本。

结果

依那普利的额外治疗导致额外成本250万瑞士法郎。然而,依那普利组住院成本的降低(节省645万瑞士法郎)抵消了这些增量成本。对于SOLVD研究的整个治疗队列,净节省约为426万瑞士法郎。

结论

从临床角度来看,ACE抑制剂治疗可降低心力衰竭的进展,减少心血管发病率和死亡率。从卫生经济学角度而言,可以证明依那普利治疗不仅具有临床益处,而且还能转化为每位患者高达3315瑞士法郎的可观经济节省。

相似文献

1
[Cost effectiveness of ACE inhibition in therapy of chronic heart failure in Switzerland: evaluation based on the SOLVD study].[瑞士慢性心力衰竭治疗中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的成本效益:基于SOLVD研究的评估]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997 Jul 22;127(29-30):1234-41.
2
[Cost effectiveness of captopril after myocardial infarct; comment].[心肌梗死后卡托普利的成本效益;评论]
Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Feb 15;91(2):112-8.
3
Multinational economic evaluation of valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT).缬沙坦用于慢性心力衰竭患者的多国经济学评估:缬沙坦心力衰竭试验(Val-HeFT)的结果
Am Heart J. 2004 Jul;148(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.040.
4
Costs and effectiveness of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 May 23;154(10):1143-9.
5
Use of valsartan for the treatment of heart-failure patients not receiving ACE inhibitors: a budget impact analysis.缬沙坦用于治疗未接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的心力衰竭患者:预算影响分析。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.014.
6
[A Czech and Slovak interventional study of spirapril (the CASSIS study). A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study in chronic heart failure].[捷克和斯洛伐克关于螺普利的干预性研究(CASSIS研究)。一项针对慢性心力衰竭的随机、双盲、多中心、安慰剂对照研究]
Vnitr Lek. 1997 Jun;43(6):351-8.
7
Tolerability of carvedilol and ACE-Inhibition in mild heart failure. Results of CARMEN (Carvedilol ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild CHF EvaluatioN).卡维地洛与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在轻度心力衰竭中的耐受性。卡门研究(卡维地洛血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂重塑轻度慢性心力衰竭评估)结果
Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Jun;6(4):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.12.019.
8
The relevance of subgroup-specific treatment effects: the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) revisited.亚组特异性治疗效果的相关性:对左心室功能障碍研究(SOLVD)的重新审视。
Am Heart J. 2002 Dec;144(6):941-7. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.126446.
9
Economic implications of treatment guidelines for congestive heart failure.充血性心力衰竭治疗指南的经济影响
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Dec;21(14):1301-6.
10
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The analysis of multinational cost-effectiveness data for reimbursement decisions: a critical appraisal of recent methodological developments.跨国成本效益数据分析在报销决策中的应用:对近期方法学发展的批判性评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(12):1079-96. doi: 10.2165/11537760-000000000-00000.