Thornton J A, Rothblat L A, Murray E A
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 1;17(21):8536-49. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08536.1997.
To test whether the rhinal cortex (i.e., entorhinal and perirhinal cortex) plays a time-limited role in information storage, eight rhesus monkeys were trained to criterion on two sets of 60 object discrimination problems, one set at each of two different time periods separated by 15 weeks. After the monkeys had learned both sets, two groups balanced for preoperative acquisition rates were formed. One group received bilateral ablation of the rhinal cortex (n = 4), and the other was retained as an unoperated control group (n = 4). After a 2 week rest period, monkeys were assessed for retention of the object discrimination problems. Retention was significantly poorer in monkeys with removals of the rhinal cortex relative to the controls (68 vs 91%). Although both groups showed slightly better retention of problems from the more recently learned set, there was no evidence of a differential effect of the cortical removal across sets (i.e., no temporal gradient). In addition, the monkeys with rhinal cortex lesions subsequently learned three new sets of 10 object discrimination problems as quickly as the controls did, thus ruling out the possibility of a gross impairment in visual perception or discrimination abilities. Furthermore, they retained these postoperatively learned object discriminations as well as the controls did. The findings indicate that the rhinal cortex is critical for the storage and/or retrieval of object discrimination problems that were learned up to 16 weeks before rhinal cortex ablation; however, in the absence of the rhinal cortex, efficient learning and retention of new discrimination problems can still occur.
为了测试鼻皮质(即内嗅皮质和嗅周皮质)在信息存储中是否发挥限时作用,八只恒河猴接受训练,以达到两套各60个物体辨别问题的标准,这两套问题分别在相隔15周的两个不同时间段进行训练。在猴子学会这两套问题后,根据术前习得率形成了两组平衡的猴子。一组接受双侧鼻皮质切除术(n = 4),另一组作为未手术的对照组保留(n = 4)。经过2周的休息期后,对猴子进行物体辨别问题的记忆评估。与对照组相比,切除鼻皮质的猴子的记忆明显较差(68%对91%)。尽管两组对最近学到的那组问题的记忆都略好一些,但没有证据表明跨组切除皮质有不同效果(即没有时间梯度)。此外,有鼻皮质损伤的猴子随后学习三套新的各10个物体辨别问题的速度与对照组一样快,从而排除了视觉感知或辨别能力严重受损的可能性。此外,它们术后习得的这些物体辨别记忆与对照组一样好。这些发现表明,鼻皮质对于在鼻皮质切除术前长达16周所学的物体辨别问题的存储和/或检索至关重要;然而,在没有鼻皮质的情况下,仍然可以有效地学习和记忆新的辨别问题。