Suppr超能文献

急性尿潴留患者的尿动力学评估:前列腺切除术后治疗失败是否可预测?

Urodynamic assessment of patients with acute urinary retention: is treatment failure after prostatectomy predictable?

作者信息

Djavan B, Madersbacher S, Klingler C, Marberger M

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1829-33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64139-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Some patients with acute urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia do not have successful outcome after prostatectomy and require either a chronic indwelling urethral catheter or clean intermittent catheterization. Urodynamic and clinical parameters were examined preoperatively in 81 men 56 to 93 years old (mean age 72 years) in search of an outcome predictor after prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

International Prostate Symptom Score, prostate volume, retention episodes, retention volume and urodynamic parameters from a multichannel pressure-flow study were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients underwent transurethral prostatectomy and were reexamined 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery. A multichannel pressure-flow study was performed preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 24 weeks postoperatively 11 patients (13%) were unable to void and therefore classified as treatment failures while the remaining patients voided spontaneously and were classified as treatment successes. There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.005) between treatment failure and treatment success regarding age (83.5 +/- 7 versus 70.1 +/- 8 years), preoperative volume of retention (1,780 versus 1,080 ml.), and maximal detrusor pressure (24.4 versus 73.5 cm. water), but not to International Prostate Symptom Score, episodes of retention and prostate volume. The ability to void during preoperative pressure flow study and the presence of detrusor instability predicted good outcome. In treatment success patients postoperative urodynamic data showed significant decrease in detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate (from 80.8 +/- 33 to 34.6 +/- 10 cm. water). Those with treatment failure had an increase in maximal detrusor pressure (from 26 +/- 12 to 42.6 +/- 13 cm. water), suggesting detrusor recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute urinary retention, age 80 years or older, with retention volume greater than 1,500 ml., no evidence of instability and maximal detrusor pressure less than 28 cm. water are at high risk of treatment failure. However, despite treatment failure the detrusor may recover in patients younger than 80. Therefore, prostatectomy should still be performed in this group (less than 80 years old) even if preoperative urodynamics suggest an unfavorable outcome.

摘要

目的

一些因良性前列腺增生导致急性尿潴留的患者在前列腺切除术后未取得成功的结果,需要长期留置尿道导管或进行清洁间歇性导尿。对81名年龄在56至93岁(平均年龄72岁)的男性患者术前进行尿动力学和临床参数检查,以寻找前列腺切除术后的结果预测指标。

材料与方法

分析术前和术后的国际前列腺症状评分、前列腺体积、尿潴留发作次数、尿潴留量以及多通道压力-流率研究的尿动力学参数。所有患者均接受经尿道前列腺切除术,并在术后2、4、12和24周进行复查。术前和术后12周进行多通道压力-流率研究。

结果

术后24周时,11名患者(13%)无法自行排尿,因此被归类为治疗失败,其余患者能自行排尿,被归类为治疗成功。治疗失败组与治疗成功组在年龄(83.5±7岁对70.1±8岁)、术前尿潴留量(1780 ml对1080 ml)和最大逼尿肌压力(24.4 cm水柱对73.5 cm水柱)方面存在统计学显著差异(p<0.005),但在国际前列腺症状评分、尿潴留发作次数和前列腺体积方面无差异。术前压力-流率研究时的排尿能力和逼尿肌不稳定的存在可预测良好的结果。在治疗成功的患者中,术后尿动力学数据显示最大流率时逼尿肌压力显著降低(从80.8±33 cm水柱降至34.6±10 cm水柱)。治疗失败的患者最大逼尿肌压力升高(从26±12 cm水柱升至42.6±13 cm水柱),提示逼尿肌恢复。

结论

年龄80岁及以上、尿潴留量大于1500 ml、无不稳定证据且最大逼尿肌压力小于28 cm水柱的急性尿潴留患者治疗失败风险高。然而,尽管治疗失败,但80岁以下患者的逼尿肌可能恢复。因此,即使术前尿动力学提示预后不佳,该组(80岁以下)患者仍应进行前列腺切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验