Suppr超能文献

哮喘儿童静脉注射茶碱的处置:贝叶斯方法与直接药代动力学计算对比

Disposition of intravenous theophylline in asthmatic children: Bayesian approach vs direct pharmacokinetic calculations.

作者信息

el Desoky E, Ghazal M H, Mohamed M A, Klotz U

机构信息

Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Egypt.

出版信息

Jpn J Pharmacol. 1997 Sep;75(1):13-20. doi: 10.1254/jjp.75.13.

Abstract

Fifteen children (mean age +/- SD: 6.4 +/- 3.4, range: 2-12 years) with an acute asthma attack were treated by an intravenous dosage regimen of theophylline (30 min loading infusion of 6 mg/kg body weight followed by a constant infusion of 1 mg/kg, twice for 6 hr each). Three blood samples were drawn (each 15 min after the bolus infusion and after the two infusion periods of 6 hr). Plasma clearance (CL), apparent volume of distribution (Vd) and elimination half-life (t1/2) were estimated by the Bayesian approach using either only the first peak level (Bay 1) or all three monitored concentrations (Bay 3). These values were compared to the parameters calculated by a standard pharmacokinetic procedure (SC). Therapeutic steady state plasma levels around 12 micrograms/ml were rapidly achieved, and the pharmacokinetic parameters (CL = 1.1-1.5 ml/min/kg, Vd = 0.44-0.50 l/kg, t1/2 = 3.5-5.4 hr) differed slightly between the 3 methods applied. There was a significant linear correlation between the Bayesian-derived and SC-derived pharmacokinetic parameters. However the method Bay 1 seems to overestimate the elimination rate of theophylline more than Bay 3 does. In conclusion, Bayesian-based therapeutic plasma level monitoring (Bay 3 are better than Bay 1) can be utilized for individualized pharmacokinetic calculations and proper dosage predictions of theophylline in pediatric patients.

摘要

15名急性哮喘发作儿童(平均年龄±标准差:6.4±3.4岁,范围:2 - 12岁)接受了静脉注射茶碱的治疗方案(先以6mg/kg体重进行30分钟的负荷输注,随后以1mg/kg持续输注,每次6小时,共两次)。采集了三份血样(在推注输注后以及两个6小时输注期结束后每隔15分钟采集一次)。使用仅第一个峰值水平(Bay 1)或所有三个监测浓度(Bay 3)通过贝叶斯方法估算血浆清除率(CL)、表观分布容积(Vd)和消除半衰期(t1/2)。将这些值与通过标准药代动力学程序(SC)计算的参数进行比较。迅速达到了约12μg/ml的治疗稳态血浆水平,并且所应用的三种方法之间的药代动力学参数(CL = 1.1 - 1.5ml/min/kg,Vd = 0.44 - 0.50l/kg,t1/2 = 3.5 - 5.4小时)略有不同。贝叶斯推导和SC推导的药代动力学参数之间存在显著的线性相关性。然而,Bay 1方法似乎比Bay 3方法更高估茶碱的消除率。总之,基于贝叶斯的治疗性血浆水平监测(Bay 3优于Bay 1)可用于儿科患者中茶碱的个体化药代动力学计算和适当剂量预测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验