Suppr超能文献

使用与16S核糖体DNA序列互补的两种寡核苷酸探针快速鉴定苜蓿根瘤菌菌株。

Rapid identification of Medicago nodulating strains by using two oligonucleotide probes complementary to 16S rDNA sequences.

作者信息

Rome S, Cleyet-Marel J C, Materon L A, Normand P, Brunel B

机构信息

Institut national de la recherche agronomique, Ecole nationale supérieure agronomique de Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Can J Microbiol. 1997 Sep;43(9):854-61. doi: 10.1139/m97-124.

Abstract

Symbiotic bacteria associated with the Medicago genus are separated into two closely related species named Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae. To discriminate rapidly between these two bacterial species, two 15-base DNA probes, 16Smfs and 16Smed, were designed from the alignment of 16S rDNA sequences to differentiate S. meliloti from S. medicae. Their specificities were evaluated by dot-blot hybridization experiments on 25 reference strains representing 13 species of Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium, and by comparison with all 16S rDNA sequences available in the GenBank data base. No cross-reaction was found with 16Smed, which was thus considered species specific for S. medicae. By contrast, as expected according to the 16S rDNA sequence alignment, the labeled 16Smfs probe cross-hybridized with the DNAs of S. meliloti, Sinorhizobium fredii, and Sinorhizobium saheli but not with the DNA of S. medicae. Since S. saheli and S. fredii do not nodulate Medicago, 16Smed and 16Smfs can be routinely used to characterize the two Sinorhizobium species nodulating Medicago from pure cultures or from Medicago root nodules. Fifty strains isolated from eight annual Medicago species were then characterized by using colony hybridizations. Sinorhizobium meliloti was more frequently obtained (> 80% isolates) than was S. medicae. Both Sinorhizobium species seemed to be trapped by annual Medicago and no plant-host specificity was detected.

摘要

与苜蓿属相关的共生细菌分为两个密切相关的物种,即苜蓿中华根瘤菌和百脉根中华根瘤菌。为了快速区分这两种细菌,根据16S rDNA序列比对设计了两个15碱基的DNA探针,即16Smfs和16Smed,以区分苜蓿中华根瘤菌和百脉根中华根瘤菌。通过对代表根瘤菌属和中华根瘤菌属13个物种的25个参考菌株进行斑点杂交实验,并与GenBank数据库中所有可用的16S rDNA序列进行比较,评估了它们的特异性。未发现16Smed有交叉反应,因此认为它是百脉根中华根瘤菌的种特异性探针。相比之下,根据16S rDNA序列比对预期,标记的16Smfs探针与苜蓿中华根瘤菌、费氏中华根瘤菌和萨赫勒中华根瘤菌的DNA发生交叉杂交,但与百脉根中华根瘤菌的DNA不发生交叉杂交。由于萨赫勒中华根瘤菌和费氏中华根瘤菌不能使苜蓿结瘤,16Smed和16Smfs可常规用于从纯培养物或苜蓿根瘤中鉴定两种能使苜蓿结瘤的中华根瘤菌物种。然后通过菌落杂交对从8种一年生苜蓿物种中分离出的50个菌株进行了鉴定。苜蓿中华根瘤菌的获得频率(>80%的分离物)高于百脉根中华根瘤菌。这两种中华根瘤菌似乎都被一年生苜蓿捕获,未检测到植物宿主特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验