Tekay A, Järvelä I, Jouppila P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oulu, Finland.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;10(3):198-204. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030198.x.
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal Doppler velocimetry measurements in uterine arteries were assessed by two observers in 20 postmenopausal women. In addition, the agreement between the observers regarding the detection of an ovary as well as the presence or absence of intraovarian arterial blood flow was documented. Pulsatility index (PI), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMV) measurements in uterine arteries were made twice by the same investigator (IJ). Thereafter, the same measurements were made by the second investigator (AT). The agreement in categorical data was studied by using 2 x 2 tables and Cohen's kappa-coefficient. Reproducibility of the Doppler measurements was analyzed by using coefficient of variation, repeatability coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, mean differences and limits of agreement. In addition, the 95% confidence interval was calculated as appropriate. There was agreement of 95-100% between the observers with respect to the detection of an ovary in transvaginal scanning. Agreement regarding the presence or absence of intraovarian arterial blood flow, however, was only 75-81%. Intraobserver repeatability was very good, the intraclass correlation coefficient being 0.98-0.99 and the coefficient of variation 6% in PI measurements. The PSV measurements showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94-0.96 and a coefficient of variation of 10-12%. The intraclass correlation coefficient for TAMV measurements was 0.94 and the coefficient of variation varied from 12 to 16%. Interobserver agreement was good. There was no bias between the observers' measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient for PI measurements was between 0.93 and 0.95, and the coefficient of variation was 11%. For PSV measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.79-0.80 and the coefficient of variation was 18-29%. TAMV measurements showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83-0.84 and a coefficient of variation of 19-29%. When the limits of agreement for Doppler velocimetry measurements are considered, we expect the two observers to give PI measurements that differ by less than 0.7, with any discrepancy being equally likely in either direction. In conclusion, based on the high intraclass correlation coefficients, the intraobserver repeatability of all Doppler parameters was very good, the most reliable measurement being the PI. Variation in PSV and TAMV measurements increased considerably, however, when Doppler velocimetry was carried out by two investigators instead of one.
两名观察者对20名绝经后女性的子宫动脉经阴道多普勒测速测量的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性进行了评估。此外,记录了观察者之间关于卵巢检测以及卵巢内动脉血流是否存在的一致性。子宫动脉的搏动指数(PI)、收缩期峰值速度(PSV)和时间平均最大速度(TAMV)测量由同一名研究者(IJ)进行了两次。此后,第二名研究者(AT)进行了相同的测量。分类数据的一致性通过使用2×2表格和科恩kappa系数进行研究。多普勒测量的可重复性通过变异系数、重复性系数、组内相关系数、平均差异和一致性界限进行分析。此外,在适当情况下计算了95%置信区间。在经阴道扫描中,观察者之间关于卵巢检测的一致性为95%-100%。然而,关于卵巢内动脉血流是否存在的一致性仅为75%-81%。观察者内重复性非常好,PI测量的组内相关系数为0.98-0.99,变异系数为6%。PSV测量的组内相关系数为0.94-0.96,变异系数为10%-12%。TAMV测量的组内相关系数为0.94,变异系数在12%-16%之间变化。观察者间一致性良好。观察者测量之间没有偏差。PI测量的组内相关系数在0.93-0.95之间,变异系数为11%。对于PSV测量,组内相关系数为0.79-0.80,变异系数为18%-29%。TAMV测量的组内相关系数为0.83-0.84,变异系数为19%-29%。当考虑多普勒测速测量的一致性界限时,我们预计两名观察者给出的PI测量值相差小于0.7,任何差异在两个方向上的可能性相同。总之,基于高组内相关系数,所有多普勒参数的观察者内重复性非常好,最可靠的测量是PI。然而,当由两名研究者而不是一名研究者进行多普勒测速时,PSV和TAMV测量的变异显著增加。